Exactly. Once it's begun testing, creatives will only be given as much time as testing takes to complete. Think it will look pretty American 'car-park' style to some extent.
I see no other funding model other than taxation that would see its impartiality preserved.
The left think it's right.
The right think it's left.
Conservatives think it's Labour.
Labour think it's Conservative.
Brexiteers think it's Remainer.
Remainers think it's Brexiteering.
Seems the truth...
These media reviews are fine, but it might take the general public, weeks, months or even years to get the varied experiences it reportedly offers with this throughput and queue management?
How amazing that would be to be a thing in the UK! Not sure if this covered by an existing agreement, general development order (GDO) etc. I'm sure someone can advise!
Believe it will be popular with the youngsters that are often at Chessington and wider families; but I am not sure that is necessarily a good thing when capacity could realistically be about 600 per hour.
Ultimately it is a 28-seater train. I don't believe that fact it is wing means it will load faster than another 28-seat design. You could also have more seats in a different train design. No real sense in John's comments for me.
Would say barring a disaster it is as nailed on as it can be to open on 18 March. The ride page invites you to 'book now' with not caveats around an opening date. Big difference to the approach at Thorpe with Ghost Train and Chessington with Mandrill.
With the Smiler they claimed to have responded to market research and feedback that rides were "too short"...this seems to be a government-esque u-turn on that.
People are free to disclose what they wish, it is a public consultation. They could of course enforce the no photo-taking rule within their private building of course. Won't be long until something gets out now.
I tend to agree, but they said - you could say misleadingly - that it was simply the basic concept on table and that the tendering process was still ongoing and anyone could win it.
In reality, I accept that they would have at least informally decided by the time they come to consultation stage...
Note that despite the artwork giving a strong indication of a B&M, they claimed that a half-dozen manufacturers still had their name in the hat and no decision had been taken. I'm not saying that was/is 100% true, but it could suggest that the manufacturer may not be confirmed by the park this week.
^ Tend to agree, there could easy be similar claims as at the Chessington event: "we're still looking at manufacturers etc" (even if slightly misleading).
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.