What's new

Smoking At Airports

Should there be a smoking area passed security control at airports?

  • Yes, If it is an enclosed area I don't see the harm.

    Votes: 1 100.0%
  • Yes, although I hate smoking, I appreciate that smokers need somewhere.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • No, queuing through security is smokers punishment

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • No, I don't even like seeing smoking going on

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • I couldn't care less either way

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    1

Mark

Strata Poster
Here is one that I wanted to find out particularly what the non-smokers think, since I think I know what the smokers will say... I wanted to know what non-smokers think since many of them were instrumental in the ban.

Everyone knows that since 1998, smoking has been banned in all enclosed public spaces and government buildings etc (except for Prisons) and this includes Airports.

For instance, London Gatwick Airport, once upon a time, had an enclosed smoking area in the departure lounge that had extractor fans etc for the smokers prior to the ban. Nowadays, in all BAA airports, all smoking areas have been removed from the departure lounges and the only smoking area is outside, before you pass through airport security.

As you can imagine, this can a real nightmare. Sometimes the queue for security is insane and that alone often leaves me wanting a cigarette. I have had times when it has taken over an hour to get through security. Sometimes, it just isn't possible to simply escape back out for a quick cigarette and go through security again.

Bear in mind, especially on long haul flights, you are told to arrive 3/4 hours before the flight (for a flight to Florida for instance). The flight itself is 9 hours. The 9 hours without a cigarette is always daunting for me at the very least and despite huge advances in NRT I find myself very stressed by the whole experience. I don't particularly enjoy flying at the best of times, more so when nicotine deprived. Chuck in the amount of time beforehand for check in and security and then the time after the flight for more security and then luggage collection and you are looking at roughly a 16 hour stint without a ciggie. This equals, for very many smokers, very stressed out people.

Some UK airports have managed to supply outdoor smoking areas, even after you pass security. Glasgow Prestwick being one of them. Personally, I am not asking for much, a balcony outside in the pouring rain will do me fine, anywhere would, providing it means I don't have to do security again. It would also mean that I would be able to smoke right up until about 15 minutes before boarding and thus minimise the time without a cig which equals a much more pleasant Mark :p

This whole smoking ban thing is all part of the EU rules etc, however, in a relatively new terminal in Madrid (part of the EU) airport they have a fantastic indoor provision for smokers. It has 12 foot high glass walls and extractor fans and so on. When I was there, even the non smokers (Rob and Martyn) commented that you couldn't smell it, even when I opened the door to come back out again. Ingenious, it really is. :roll: If they can do it there, why can't they here?

So my question, for the non smokers really...
Do you think there should be a designated area for smokers within the airport? Would you mind if there was one?
 
If they can have a "sharps bin" for heroin addicts in the toilets past security (seriously, WTF??? How do you get through security with your gear and needle), then I don't see the issue for providing a smoking area.

In fact, until the government get the balls to ban smoking, then they should treat smokers the same as everyone else and make the correct concessions for them.

If smoking is so dangerous, it should be banned. If you don't believe it's THAT hazardous, then you make provisions for smokers. A smoking area would not affect me as a non-smoker in the slightest. I doubt it would affect any non-smoker in the slightest.

Of course, the real answer to avoid 9 hour flight stress is to give up ;)
 
In Sweden it was BRILLIANT!

They had little glass cubes (like the ITV programme) inside the departure lounge and just after passport control!

Ok, I felt like a zoo exhibit stood in there puffing away, but at least I could have a tab!

I do agree with a smoking ban in enclosed public places, but there's nothing stopping a well ventaliated cube being installed for those proping up the NHS (and ultimately the greatest users of it!).
 
I always thought with the smoking ban they government should've had a 'license' to sell so you can smoke indoors. You have to meet certain criteria i.e. extractor fans, enough places to put out the cigarette etc.

Could've raked in the money.
 
I think it should be allowed, they should make an area for it.

It is not fair to make smokers go over 12 hours without a smoke.

It would cost an airport next to nothing to make an area outside where people can go. The main problems seem to be at London airports as even in Scotland they had a smoking area.
 
Ian said:
In Sweden it was BRILLIANT!

They had little glass cubes (like the ITV programme) inside the departure lounge and just after passport control!

Ok, I felt like a zoo exhibit stood in there puffing away, but at least I could have a tab!

I do agree with a smoking ban in enclosed public places, but there's nothing stopping a well ventaliated cube being installed for those proping up the NHS (and ultimately the greatest users of it!).

Fantastically put mr bell!

This is 100% how I feel about it... I feel a Facebook petition coming on lol
 
Just emailed gatwick airport as some web sites say you can smoke in the lounges and others say you cannot lol. I would pay £15 just so I could relax before the flight have snacks drinks and a cigg :)
 
Echo what Ian said, there was some smoking areas inside the terminal in Sweden, which is handy for the smokers. Airports stress people out big time, I know that seeing it everyday, and the amount of times I have seen people step out onto the 'ramp' (where the plane is parked) and light up is silly, especially when there is a ton of fuel about.

I think there should be a smoking area, Spanish airports apparently have them as well near the gates. Otherwise if they don't get their nicotine hit, they can become aggressive. Yes I know there are alternatives to smoking like on Ryanair we have the smokeless cigarettes.

So I am all in favor for smoking areas in airports.
 
I would pay £15 to relax in a lounge before the flight and have a smoke, I would not even give Ryanair £15 to fly :wink:

Looks like patches, gum or mints again for me.
 
Putting smokers lounge into google comes up with interesting results.

MunichAirport+SmokersLounge.jpg
 
When Ian said they let you smoke in little glass cubes this is what sprung to mind for some reason. :p
1554FearFactor.jpg


Obviously minus the snakes and stuff. :p
 
I wouldn't mind a smoking area as long as it's either outside or in one of those ventilated box things. I would never smoke, but I don't really care if others want to, as long as I can't smell it (I really hate that smell for some reason).[/code]
 
furie said:
In fact, until the government get the balls to ban smoking.


Its more a money thing than anything else.

In regards to the actual topic. I've yet to experience this. so I have no oppinion...
 
kimahri said:
furie said:
In fact, until the government get the balls to ban smoking.


Its more a money thing than anything else.

Yep, I'm quite aware of what the issue is, but if smoking is "a deadly and a serious health risk, so much so that it needs to be banned in public places" then money shouldn't be an issue. Ban it outright, or give concessions to smokers. Don't half-arse the job and make smokers the enemy/victim.
 
Mark said:
Dave said:
Putting smokers lounge into google comes up with interesting results.

MunichAirport+SmokersLounge.jpg

Indeed it does, very misleading tbh...

That's genuinely what they look like guys. Except there was a TINY one in Sweden which could fit like 3 people in it! :lol:

Makes smokers looks like circus animals though, which, to be fair, is hilarious!
 
furie said:
kimahri said:
furie said:
In fact, until the government get the balls to ban smoking.


Its more a money thing than anything else.

Yep, I'm quite aware of what the issue is, but if smoking is "a deadly and a serious health risk, so much so that it needs to be banned in public places" then money shouldn't be an issue. Ban it outright, or give concessions to smokers. Don't half-arse the job and make smokers the enemy/victim.

I totally agree Phil. I had this discussion with a friend a while back. His argument for why they can't ban it was that it would be against my human rights... Poor excuse yeah?

If that is the case, then I have a human right to be able to have a cigarette indoors and it not effect non-smokers so everywhere should provide a facility to do this no? Of course, this is a totally selfish way of looking at it. I don't really mind that they have forced us outside for a cig, except in specific situations, especially when it can be very simply rectified. The irony is that the smoking ban was brought in to make it fairer for non-smokers, which I agree, I know you don't want my second hand smoke. However, it has now gone from one extreme to the other with the smokers being the ones that are discriminated against. Surely a balance can be found?

As far as I am concerned, if they are THAT worried about my welfare, make it illegal, ban it completely... However, don't come knocking at my door when you want to take more tax and national insurance because of the losses you make with nobody spending a small fortune on cigarettes...

Anyways, back to the airport thing...
There are actually companies that offer to supply smoking rooms at airports, it is one of their main functions I guess you could argue that the airports do not want to pay out for the facility to be put in and cleaners to look after it etc but I am pretty sure you could get a cigarette brand to sponsor it in some way to pay for it. Ironically, one of the companies I found actually do it at no cost to the airport! http://www.sovereign-publications.com/medialounge.htm
 
The government could easily ban cigarettes/smoking if they really wanted to, but they will never do it because they rake in far too much money from it, simple. This is exactly why drugs are banned, because they can't tax it and make money from it, so let's make it illegal! When actually cigarettes are far worse than most drugs...
 
I agee with what Corey said on the last page. As long as I can't smell it, I really don't care, but then again with all of those people in the little box, chances are when a door is opened or when they come out, it'll stank like poo.
 
Top