See I'm the opposite, I think it looks brilliant, the best it's looked in years, when the rest of the supports and painting has finished it will look amazing.nealbie said:Tis open and looks godawful. At least some of the supports near the stall turn still look old and sinister.
Continues to ride fabulously though.
Dunno, probably is to do with it in a roundabout way.furie said:Yeah, no more evidence than there is of the IPs running out. It's just speculation that has nothing to do with the accident :lol:
Sent from my D6603 using Tapatalk
cjbrandy said:Sorry to be off topic, quick question: Has Nemesis been open or is it still being repainted? (If you have pics pls share thanks)
The owners of Alton Towers have been told they face a large fine after admitting safety breaches on the Smiler rollercoaster ride.
Merlin Entertainments pleaded guilty to breaching the Health and Safety Act.
District Judge John McGarva, sitting at North Staffordshire Justice Centre, said the incident was a very serious case leading to life-changing injuries.
The crash last June saw two women have leg amputations as a result of their injuries.
Mr McGarva warned the firm it could face a large fine when it is sentenced.
The case has been referred to Stafford Crown Court for sentencing.
Bolded the interesting bit, of course there was a procedure, if that procedure was clear enough or followed correctly is the question.The Mirror said:During the brief hearing, HSE prosecutor Brendan Thorogood gave more information about its case against Merlin Attractions, saying staff had not been provided with proper procedure to avoid such an accident.
He told the court: “There wasn’t a system staff should should have had to follow.
“They overrode a computer controlled stop on the system and sent the train with some of those people here today around the ride.
“As a result those in the train came into collision with the stationary train.”
Joey said:Following the breakdown an engineer reset the ride because it threw up a fault that he'd literally just reset a minute ago. Except this time, the ride wasn't lying. That's my bet. He's wrong for not checking, but he's also human acting on instincts, emotion and accumulated knowledge.
DelPiero said:This was reported by the Mirror;
Bolded the interesting bit, of course there was a procedure, if that procedure was clear enough or followed correctly is the question.The Mirror said:During the brief hearing, HSE prosecutor Brendan Thorogood gave more information about its case against Merlin Attractions, saying staff had not been provided with proper procedure to avoid such an accident.
He told the court: “There wasn’t a system staff should should have had to follow.
“They overrode a computer controlled stop on the system and sent the train with some of those people here today around the ride.
“As a result those in the train came into collision with the stationary train.”
Point being, system throws up block error and next train stops. What is the procedure? Clear error and send next train? No, most likely contact Manager or Engineer. Whats his procedure? Check block which has errored for reason? Likely, did they check? No. Ergo - procedure not followed.
I find it unlikely that Gerst didn't give full training to Ops/Managers/Engineers on what to do in this situation.
I totally agree.CoastinBear said:There is another way to look at the part you put in bold text: Seeing as the management has put in a guilty plea, perhaps it is them who are taking the blame for the actual incident by accepting that they had not given the staff the proper procedures to follow. Now that would be a magnanimous gesture towards the staff whose actions caused the collision.
Unlikely? It's a certainly. Before any ride is handed over to the park management, full testing (including deliberate breakdowns) and training is done by the manufacturer. Once the park management are happy they know everything they want to know, it is signed over. There is no way a big company like Gerstaluer would just toss AT the keys and drive off back to Germany.DelPiero said:I find it unlikely that Gerst didn't give full training to Ops/Managers/Engineers on what to do in this situation.