Surely it's a want - if it wasn't, the coaster would be removed?Chatting with somebody ... Let's say... Close to the situation. Apparently this is more of a need than a want to do.
I think he’s being captain obvious in that something needed doing about the 28yr old track and foundations as they’re on their last legs…Surely it's a want - if it wasn't, the coaster would be removed?
With that in mind, I guess we can have faith in the fact that that hole is only being left for a season at most as opposed to forever (given the ride is being retracked, I’m assuming that removal would have been the other option)!Nemesis being closed for a whole season (more or less) is gonna be leave a HUGE hole in the park's lineup.
(Yes I understand the timeline of this process, but still).
What is the actual difference between Inferno's and the original's trains? I've looked at photos for reference but can't seem to spot any differences? (Apart from size)
There is a much wider gap between the rows of seats. I can touch the seat in front with my feet on Nemesis, miles off on Inferno.I noticed the back of the seats look a little different, I'm finding it hard to get good pictures of them as most pictures are understandably from the front. As I recall Nemesis has more of a boxy frame behind the seat whereas Inferno doesn't.
Edit: I looked at some POVs, the difference is fairly minor actually, Nemesis seems to have a bar connecting the seats at the bottom whereas Nemesis Inferno does not.
I actually just went on Nemesis the other day and was on the back row. Something that I noticed which I'd never realised before was like what you said, if i put my legs straight forward, I could almost be touching the carriage infront whereas I don't recall ever being that close to the one's on Inferno.There is a much wider gap between the rows of seats. I can touch the seat in front with my feet on Nemesis, miles off on Inferno.
As this post is getting lots of shocked gasps and angry reactions, I’d like to apologise for my awful behaviour, and I’d also like to clarify what I meant, because I don’t think I put it across in the best way last night.With that in mind, I guess we can have faith in the fact that that hole is only being left for a season at most as opposed to forever (given the ride is being retracked, I’m assuming that removal would have been the other option)!
To be honest, though; as much as I love Nemesis, and I will miss it while it’s shut, I won’t be devastated at the prospect of not riding it for a year. Perhaps that’s because Nemesis isn’t my favourite coaster at Towers like it is for most (that title goes to Wicker Man, with Oblivion also outranking Nemesis), but I don’t feel like having Nemesis shut will leave as much of a gaping hole in Towers’ lineup for me as it seemingly will for most.
don't worry about it, you like what you like and shouldn't need to apologise for it.As this post is getting lots of shocked gasps and angry reactions, I’d like to apologise for my awful behaviour, and I’d also like to clarify what I meant, because I don’t think I put it across in the best way last night.
I won’t deny that Nemesis going down for a season will leave a hole, because it certainly will. It’s a ride I’ve ridden at least once on the bulk of my Towers visits over the years, and it’s a ride I like a lot and one that has a lot of sentimental value for me.
However, some of these posts seem to imply that other people feel that Nemesis’ absence will significantly decrease the quality of Towers’ lineup and not make it worth visiting while the ride is shut, which I don’t personally agree with. I’ll happily digress that I don’t rate Nemesis as highly as most, and I do prefer Wicker Man & Oblivion within Towers. And Rita isn’t that far from Nemesis in my rankings, either (albeit an entire point below, scoring an 8 while Nemesis scores a 9), and Thirteen rates pretty decently too (a solid 7).
My point is; while I love Nemesis, I don’t think its absence will leave as much of a gaping hole for me as it does for others, because Towers still has plenty of other rides I rate highly (higher than Nemesis, in some cases), and the reason I said that I wouldn’t be devastated at the prospect of not riding it for a year is because that’s a far easier pill to swallow than the alternative option of the ride being removed, and us never getting to ride it again. Nemesis is awesome and loved, and I don’t think it deserves to be permanently removed, so I can take a year of the ride being down if it keeps the ride going for another 30 years.
I apologise once again (I feel slightly bad even saying that Nemesis isn’t my favourite coaster at Towers, or that I don’t rate it as highly as others…), and I hope I made my point clearer.
I mean, it got a shocked face from Will, who still lives in 1994 and worships B&M like they’re gods, and the creators of all… With Nemesis being their 1st wonder of the world.As this post is getting lots of shocked gasps and angry reactions, I’d like to apologise for my awful behaviour, and I’d also like to clarify what I meant, because I don’t think I put it across in the best way last night.
I won’t deny that Nemesis going down for a season will leave a hole, because it certainly will. It’s a ride I’ve ridden at least once on the bulk of my Towers visits over the years, and it’s a ride I like a lot and one that has a lot of sentimental value for me. It’s my most ridden coaster.
However, some of these posts seem to imply that other people feel that Nemesis’ absence will significantly decrease the quality of Towers’ lineup and not make it worth visiting while the ride is shut, which I don’t personally agree with. I’ll happily digress that I don’t rate Nemesis as highly as most, and I do prefer Wicker Man & Oblivion within Towers. And Rita isn’t that far from Nemesis in my rankings, either (albeit an entire point below, scoring an 8 while Nemesis scores a 9), and Thirteen rates pretty decently too (a solid 7).
My point is; while I love Nemesis, I don’t think its absence will leave as much of a gaping hole for me as it does for others, because Towers still has plenty of other rides I rate highly (higher than Nemesis, in some cases), and the reason I said that I wouldn’t be devastated at the prospect of not riding it for a year is because that’s a far easier pill to swallow than the alternative option of the ride being removed, and us never getting to ride it again. Nemesis is awesome and loved, and I don’t think it deserves to be permanently removed, so I can take a year of the ride being down if it keeps the ride going for another 30 years.
I apologise once again (I feel slightly bad even saying that Nemesis isn’t my favourite coaster at Towers, or that I don’t rate it as highly as others…), and I hope I made my point clearer.
Hahahaha. I was going to explain, but Nick's hit the nail on the head If stating your opinion is 'awful behaviour' then I'm clearly hellbound, so please chillI mean, it got a shocked face from Will, who still lives in 1994 and worships B&M like they’re gods, and the creators of all… With Nemesis being their 1st wonder of the world.