Matt N
CF Legend
I'm not sure they'd get away with putting an XTREME Spinning Coaster where Spinball is, personally, nor do I see them doing it. The planners are known to hate the ride that's there already for spoiling the view of the Towers Ruins, and I don't see a Mack XTREME Spinning Coaster making that any better. If anything replaces Spinball, I think it'll be an expansion for CBeebies Land; that land is prime real estate for future CBeebies stuff if Spinball were to be removed.I’m going to go with the theory that it’ll be a Mack Extreme Spinner, and it’ll replace Spinball.
No good reason for this… Just me willing it into existence
There's certainly nothing wrong with "willing things into existence", though! I mean, that's exactly what I and many others did in the Exodus thread last year... even if us B&M Hyper advocates were vindicated somewhat when the park revealed the alternative layout proposal, our theory didn't ultimately come true, and at the time, I will accept in hindsight that there was very little concrete evidence supporting a B&M Hyper aside from our own will for one to come, no matter how hard I may have argued that there was concrete evidence at the time. So if I were to criticise "willing things into existence" (I'm not, for clarity), then I would be the world's biggest hypocrite!
And to be honest, I could certainly see a Mack XTREME Spinning Coaster as a potential option for SW9... just not on that site. My comment above was merely explaining why I don't feel SW9 will go there, and I apologise if I come across disparaging, as that's not what I intend. You could well be right and I could be feeling very sheepish come 2025 or whenever it opens for all I know!