Are we still in the mindset that anything other than B&M and Intamin is cheap?
Verbolten is better than Thirteen. Could Intamin have made a better one without Alton's restrictions and dumb design concepts? Well, yeah, I'm sure they could have... But, Verbolten was a solid addition in my opinion. I'm a fan of it on many levels, but the most important thing is that it replaced Wolf to become the park's ONLY family coaster. (Well, I suppose Loch Ness counts.)
Why the hell was Busch Williamsburg ever short on family rides?
And that's why this thing could be a pile of absolute crap and still be the right decision.
Now, Tempesto and Mach Tower I don't get. Cheap thrill rides I don't get. Cheap hardware, cheap execution and adult audience is ... Just lame. But cheap hardware + thematic elements like Verbolten and a family audience? Yes. Especially when the ride experience lives up to expectation.
I'm not sure Invadr needs Verbolten levels of theming to work - the setting in the woods is kinda enough, but it would be awesome if it does a little more given its short length.
I'm just so surprised to see Busch do what I consider to be the right thing, that I'm perhaps a little over praising. Instead of giving us one large B&M, we're getting multiple smaller attractions. That's fine, because Busch lacked content. At the end of the day, the park still has 3 large coasters. What I'd really like to see them do is add another dark ride, but I don't think they ever will.
So whilst it seems like we're getting short straws compared to years gone by - compared to the likes of Griffon, Alpengeist and Apollo - honestly the park felt empty before. And ya know where else is the same? Dollywood. First time I went there, pre Wild Eagle, there really wasn't a whole lot to do. I wanted more like the Firehouse dark ride, I wanted the Topple Tower to be open. For a premium park, regardless of individual attraction quality or park scenic quality, I shouldn't feel like I had run out of stuff to do.
Sent from my MotoG3 using Tapatalk