Dang beat me to it!Aqua Trax that doesn't look slow?
RTH is only designed to run two trains and has no mid-course brake run. Plus, the 550ph figure is inaccurate. That would mean a dispatch every 104 seconds, but this POV shows the second train leaving the station less than 90 seconds after the first:I would love to see a high capacity high thrill coaster in this plot. It would help with crowd management to have a third major coaster in the area to draw some of the crowds away from Steel Vengeance and Maverick when their lines are long. Plus it would help distribute the crowd every time one of those two dumps their queue because of maintenance headaches.
Edit: so maybe NOT an extreme spinner, unless Mack can figure out how to triple the capacity of Ride to Happiness. According rcdb, RtH only does 550 riders per hour, which is even worse capacity than Maverick.
RTH is only designed to run two trains and has no mid-course brake run. Plus, the 550ph figure is inaccurate. That would mean a dispatch every 104 seconds, but this POV shows the second train leaving the station less than 90 seconds after the first:
This puts the throughput closer to 650pph — which is still bad, but getting the dispatch time down to 60 seconds with three-train ops and MCBRs would already bump it to 960pph, which would be more in line with how Cedar Point coasters normally operate.
This looks like they might be looking at some sort of water ride to replace it (or a retheme but I'm pretty sure it's been communicated as a permanent closure).The ride may be dead but curiously enough it's still running water;
Waterparks are a bit of a different ballgame than amusement parks, as they don't typically require as much capital investment as theme parks. They can see little change and still remain extremely popular and profitable, there's just not an incentive to build a new slide every two years. There's exceptions to this, such as United Parks trying to impress shareholders or select international locations rapidly investing to handle demand, but generally they're not the norm.The water park is chronically underfunded, only having received a racing slide and small-drop-floor slide tower in the last ten-ish years, and would be well deserved to get a new, larger scale investment!
If it also helps add to the water slide scales, Kings Island is receiving a water slide next year - could be a bulk order.Waterparks are a bit of a different ballgame than amusement parks, as they don't typically require as much capital investment as theme parks. They can see little change and still remain extremely popular and profitable, there's just not an incentive to build a new slide every two years. There's exceptions to this, such as United Parks trying to impress shareholders or select international locations rapidly investing to handle demand, but generally they're not the norm.
Cedar Point Shores had two big transformations last decade. The racing slide was added in 2012 and also saw the repainting of the two main slide complexes. The rebrand in 2017 saw the new slide tower (not small by regional standards), entirely new kid's area, relocated entrance, more repainting, new dining, and a bunch of infrastructure changes that coincided with the removal of Challenge Park. I've visited pre and post-Shores and both were in good shape. Much better than Kings Island's waterpark at least, which definitely needs help.
Removing the Crosscurrent slides this year seemed to have been a corporate order, as Dorney concurrently did the same with theirs. They're still intending to build up a replacement for 2025, so my guess is the same here. Always great to see a new waterpark attraction, but the scales for capital investment are not the same as at theme parks.
I’ll merge and move appropriate posts to the new Vekoma construction thread. Thanks for starting the new thread!