This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
^ :lol: - To be honest, you wasn't the only one that thought that. I know it's not going to stall, but rather crawl over that hill, without a shadow of a doubt.
Dave is correct, as much as people want to make this out to be some sort of conspiracy - the delay was actually spawned from the second trench and not the skyride. To put it into perspective, as of right now Cheetah Hunt is light years ahead of where Sheikra was 6 years ago.
It wasn't necessarily a miscalculation - more so of an issue with the City of Tampa. Simple adjustments are going to be made to the skyride, but like I said prior - trench 2 is the deepest the park has ever dug and with that comes added difficulties in the construction process.
Do they do pull-throughs on all their rides, or just ones with a launch?
It seems to me that the pull-through allows them to test the environment and tracking with a car (or whatever they test pulling through) without needing to worry about the launch systems being up and running?
With a gravity based coaster, it's a case of let it drop and watch it head back to the station*. With a launch coaster, you can't sit it on a non-functional launch section and will it to make it's way around the circuit, no matter how much of a Jedi you think you are
So, they pull-through to get that testing out of the way while other crews continue working on the launch mechanisms, controls, etc... Or maybe not, I don't know, just makes sense to me...
*Also interested to know exactly how you'd do a pull through on say, Griffon...
They perform pull-throughs on all of their rides. Millennium Force was the first one that came to mind while reading your post, and that is why there is that modified support coming out of the first overbank.
It is very interesting that Intamin does pull-throughs while B&M does not. It would be very interesting to hear from both companies why they choose to do them or not.
How about that it's impossible in a B&M seat to ever extend beyond the actual train "envelope" and B&M design their trains/seats particularly with that in mind?
So they don't need a pull through to test limits as they know the dimensions of the trains and it's fine... Unless they do clearance testing with a B&M?
It might also be the way Intamin check the track for any manufacturing defects. They test clearances AND the track from end to end at the same time?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.