I haven't posted in this topic much, mainly because I'm not at all qualified in virology or epidemiology. However, I am becoming increasingly concerned at how the public are unquestioning about the fact we are seeing a rise in the virus, and are assuming it’s inevitable we have a genuine second wave.
Just to set the scene, I’m not a conspiracy theorist... I don’t think the virus was a hoax or planted and I don’t think it’s part of some larger new world order. I have been wearing a mask when required, distancing, sanitizing etc... and am generally a compliant citizen.
I’m obviously not in medicine so am arguably out of my depth reading medical papers, but I have studied a bit of sociology in my time and have always been fascinated how as a society we collectively “decide” what is true, what is false and “what’s going on”. How information is presented and how many times in history large groups of people have acted in good faith ... but based on a misunderstanding of the situation. Everyone in society wears goggles and views everything through what the collective have decided (or have had decided for them). Like when back in the day it was “known” disease was passed through bad atmospheres, and the idea that little invisible germs lived on the hands of doctors if unwashed was just ridiculous, it just didn’t make sense with what was “known” to be scientific fact.
My feeling is that we are going through something similar right now. It feels like we are living through a second extraordinary event. A time where we are collectively assuming something as a society, which later the history books will show to be a flawed understanding.
We all sat daily and listened as the death count rose and fell during the actual pandemic, and then now, the information has been switched to “cases”. Firstly, I question the term “cases”. A “case” is a medical definition meaning the person requires hospitalisation and treatment. What they are actually reporting is positive tests.
Positive tests are always high after a pandemic because the tests can not distinguish between those who actively have the virus now, and those who have had it in the last few months but still carry dead/disabled virus cells. This is now not a theory, but confirmed by our government a few days ago (albeit very quietly).
Slowly but surely I’m starting to see creditable scientists coming forward to question what the assumptions are. My concern is that anything that questions what is going on is hijacked by conspiracy theorists and instantly becomes nonsense!
I think it’s perfectly sensible to question assumptions when they have had such a serious impact on our society. I’m hoping society creates a group of sensible, creditable individuals that can come forward and start to ask questions.
If you have any interest in wanting to hear a few of these interesting theories ... if you don’t know what a casedemic is... then I recommend listening to these clips.
This is a former chief scientific adviser stating his reasons why there is
not a second wave! Long story short - it's the same reason why SARS and MERS
didnt have a second wave:
And although this chap isn’t a scientist he is apt at examining data, and translating it into easy language for the public to understand. It's quite a slog at 40-odd minutes, but well worth your time. In a nutshell he's saying that, fundamentally,
the pandemic is over, and has been since roughly late May/early June.
The mainstream media are now also starting to bring in question marks. This article from the BBC
Scientists say a positive coronavirus result does not guarantee that someone is infectious.
www.bbc.co.uk
"But cases are on the rise!", I hear you cry. Well, both of these videos are only a few days old, so the current rise in 'cases' is discussed in depth. What we should really be focusing on is the number of DEATHS related to Covid, as that's the only true measure of a pandemic's trajectory. I believe we're down to single figures now, with less than 1% of total daily deaths in England being attributed to Corona virus?
Here's another interesting article discussing how Sweden's big anti-lockdown gamble is looking like it may have paid off:
The R rate is low and the economy is thriving. Freddie Sayers asks if the nation’s incredible gamble to refuse lockdown has paid off
www.standard.co.uk
As a result of this little bout of research that I've been doing, I've come to a decision: I'm ditching the masks. I'm not gonna wear one anymore. Not indoors, not in shops, not to walk to a table in a restaurant, and definitely not to a theme park.
I know what you're thinking: "You can't do that Howie, masks are mandatory in shops n stuff".
Well, yes... unless you're exempt. And to be exempt, all you have to do is say to yourself "I'm exempt". That's it. You don't need to have any medical ailment, or breathing difficulties, or one lung, or a psychological condition, or anything at all. You just need decide for yourself if you're exempt or not. This isn't some sneaky loophole that allows you to 'get round' the law, it's the actual legal stance of the current guidelines - whether or not someone is exempt is entirely down to the individual. No documentation or written proof is required and once it's been established that you're exempt, anyone who questions that fact is themselves breaking the law. Even the police aren't permitted to challenge you any further.
The UK government has mastered the art of making laws that are unenforceable.
See for yourself, download and print your own 'I'm Exempt' badges/lanyards here:
This page explains what face coverings are, including what makes a good one, when to wear a face covering and exemptions from wearing one.
www.gov.uk
As I said earlier, I'm not political and I have no comment on whether the mask policy or the newly introduced rule of 6 'make sense', and I'm certainly not getting into any verbal fisticuffs with anyone who thinks I'm being selfish or irresponsible. Rather I'd encourage you to look past the alarmist headlines and start looking at some of the new research constantly being published and decide for yourself whether or not things 'make sense'. I think it's important that we all seek out credible, alternative viewpoints alongside our daily dose of the official line and to raise questions about the assumptions these measures to control our lives are based on.
If this questioning doesn't resonate with you, that's totally cool, 95% of the media is with you. Wear your mask, stay safe and scroll on.
But for anyone with a slightly curious mind who wants to look at things slightly differently, I hope this post has been of interest.