andrus said:
The US opened up an entirely new world of painfully rough woodies for me!
Before the live the most rough woodie I had been on was probably Stampida. But Stampidas "roughness" isn't painful, it just adds to the fun and enhance the out of control feeling imo!
Some of the woodies in america tried to kill me for sure though! Both Wildcat (LC) and Hurler (KD) were headache inducing. And several others like the GCIs Roar (SFA) and Wildcat (HP), which had great layouts, were so rough that it was impossible to enjoy them for me :/
wow, that's really odd. I thought both the Wildcat's you mention were okay and Hurler was too.
They certainly had a bit of bashing around, but I enjoyed the coasters more than they gave me any pain - though I know I'm probably the only person in the world that enjoyed Hurler. I don't mind a bit (or even a lot) of laterals though, so maybe that's it?
The two Cyclones (Coney Island and SFNE) however were both disgusting. The amount of back battering pain they gave made Stampida look like a soft mattress.
For me, it's all about the pain/pleasure thing (I've been into this before a lot). At some point, the amount of pain you're in (or the anticipation of pain) lasts for longer than any pleasure you get from the coaster. At that point the ride fails.
Joey also mentions about the ability to re-ride and that's important too. I don't mind a rough ride that beats me up a little if there's a lot of fun to be had (the wooden wild mice rides say). However, you know if you re-ride them then the pain will get unbearable over time.
Again it's been mentioned that most people don't ride enough to learn how to "not get hurt", but you shouldn't have to learn to do that anyway. As enthusiasts though we also tend to spend so much time on coasters, we notice the pain more. Andrus will have noticed more pain in the coasters above because having spent days riding and re-riding hundreds of coaster circuits, you just become sensitive to it and your body just says "enough". It's why the public often like rides we'd avoid like the plague, because the amount of pain they've had inflicted on them by a coaster that year is so low that the pleasure they get from the adrenaline kick means they miss it. They may come off buzzing and going "never again", but they will have forgotten the pain by the time they ride again 12 months later (or there's a good chance they will).
JJLehto said:
Intamin has a restraint issue....why can't they have B&M style?
Because the forces Intamin put you through are much more forceful than on a B&M. I couldn't say for sure, but I suspect that if you put a B&M clamshell on an Intamin coaster, there's a good chance you'd be out of that coaster. B&M have a very deliberate "low upwards force" on their coasters - hence why you don't see clamshells on their Inverts, Floorless, etc. They also grip at a much lower point that the Intamin. the clamshells grip lower thigh so you get a lot of movement, the Intamin lapbars (and nasty OTSR) grab at around the crotch/upper thigh.
Snoo said:
That ride with anything resembling Clamshells might just be one of the best rides in the world tbh.
Look at Etnaland then
Seriously, the Mack restraints feel like a B&M Clamshell and can offer hangtime. They
might also be able to offer restraint for ejector... They are 100% the most comfortable seat/restraints I've ever had for an inverting coaster.