Hutch
Strata Poster
Hell yeah, that'd be ****ing great.I second this!! A heavily inclined launch going up the hillside would be amazing for both the scenic views and unique coaster experience!
Oh wait.
Hell yeah, that'd be ****ing great.I second this!! A heavily inclined launch going up the hillside would be amazing for both the scenic views and unique coaster experience!
Hear, hear.I'd rather the coaster actually working over the aesthetics of a zero car tho.
Nope I finally managed to ride it yesterday and both trains had no zero car.Does Lightning Rod have its zero cars back yet?
And it seems Dollywood is surveying for a new coaster. I want that hyper!
View attachment 4877
Isn't this what SDC did? The options being Time Traveller (which it was), or a B&M dive coaster? My only problem with a B&M hyper would it would basically be a less intense version of Lightning Rod. Whereas the likes of a Mack Rides hyper coaster would be totally different.And it seems Dollywood is surveying for a new coaster. I want that hyper!
View attachment 4877
Isn't this what SDC did? The options being Time Traveller (which it was), or a B&M dive coaster? My only problem with a B&M hyper would it would basically be a less intense version of Lightning Rod. Whereas the likes of a Mack Rides hyper coaster would be totally different.
I second @Kw6sTheater. Where's your source?
Read my post again. I said it would be like a LESS INTENSE version of Lightning Rod. They both provide airtime. They both provide height and speed. They both have many twists, turns, and no inversions. So yes, they are similar in some aspects. I never once mentioned anything about the launch or building material.Wait.. what?? How in any way would a B&M hyper be in anyway like Lightning Rod, a hybrid wooden launched coaster? Because of airtime? You make some weird statements sometimes..
I keep thinking I keep reading the stupidest thing I've read on these boards, and then you have to go and obliterate it. Last I checked, a hyper doesnt have wave turns, launches, or a mother ****ing quad down. There is nothing similar in the experience. At. ****ing. All.Read my post again. I said it would be like a LESS INTENSE version of Lightning Rod. They both provide airtime. They both provide height and speed. They both have many twists, turns, and no inversions. So yes, they are similar in some aspects. I never once mentioned anything about the launch or building material.
What I meant is that I've heard some people say that they find Lightning Rod and other RMCs slightly hard to reride due to the sheer strength of airtime and rapid fluctuation in g-forces, if you get what I mean.And Matt, nobody is complaining about LRod intensity. Hyper would be a completely unique experience in that park. There would be zero comparison