I'm not too sure if a hybrid would have been the best choice to build for their second major coaster. With lots of prior knowledge of coasters, we know they're vastly different from regular woodies, but would it stand out from CuChu in the public eye? The park wouldn't want their next coaster to be known as "the same as CuChu, but it goes upside down", and with that in mind it seems reasonable that they went for something with a very different, distinct, unique visual identity.
There's also the matter of what your guests will be desiring to ride. Let's not forget the old words of wisdom from Roller Coaster Tycoon: "Hybrid Coaster1 looks too intense for me!". I don't have definite research to back me up, but I'd be willing to guess that putting an inversion on a coaster cuts a double-digit percentage off the number of people who would want to ride it. If the coaster is perceived as too scary, there goes the family segment, those who pay not only for park entry, but also for parking, food, cotton candy and merchandise. It makes sense to lay down a "stepping stone" between the 2019 family coaster and an eventual thrill machine to be built later on, rather than the opposite way round.
Sure, I personally would have appreciated a huge, looping hybrid over mid-sized inverted coaster, but I can see why the park thinks differently. Thankfully, there are plenty of other thrilling coasters to choose from in Europe.