Nicky Borrill
Strata Poster
For one weekend?be next week don't worry
We’ll be there this weekend…
For one weekend?be next week don't worry
They dropped some juicy concepts at IAAPA, surprised that this wasn’t already posted here;There was some sort of concept art revealed at IAAPA Expo Europe at the booth of Jora Vision:
This typo actually makes the sentence work better!Just what they needed - should really fill a whole in their lineup.
It looks nothing like the art work posted here… The colour palette is much brighter and louder than the pastels shown above… Not sure if that’s a good thing or bad? :/All of the artwork I see for Sweet Valley just screams 1980s to me. I'm not sure why, I'm not sure if it's intentional and I'm not sure I like it. But it just does.
Also yay creds.
Long queues doesn't always mean more popularity, it can also signal a low capacity.The thing is... Most, if not all, of their mid size vekoma family coasters are excellent rides, and actually all often have more queues than their RMC, Hyper and Launch coasters!!! So you can kind of see why they keep buying them!
Long queues doesn't always mean more popularity, it can also signal a low capacity.
Long queues doesn't always mean more popularity, it can also signal a low capacity.
It can, but when you’ve an RMC, on one train, sat in the station ten minutes waiting for riders, whist several of the family coasters have queues, it’s a bit more than capacity at play.
To be clear… (On most days) The park has far too many rides and attractions for the number of guests that visit… Full stop.I think the way I look at it, if people are prepared to wait a long time for a ride, then they have some sort of expectation it will be good. If you're queueing a long time for a ride, when other rides have shorter queues, there's certainly a level of thinking of "I'm choosing to queue this amount of time for this because I want to do it, and I want to do it because I think/know it will be good". Obviously there's exceptions, such as if people have done everything else, but I think that's a big part of it.
But obviously, if all the family coasters are busier than the thrill coasters, that's telling in its own right. Is it that the park is much more densely packed with family groups than thrill-seeking groups? Is it just that the combined throughput of the thrill rides is at the right level for the park's visitors, but the family level is too low? Are the park in a position that they need to stop building thrill coasters and should look to more accessible family-thrill rides (a la the mine train)?
The park have good financial backing of course, so if they want to keep adding thrill rides and family rides and not be overly concerned that they needn't have added the former, that's great news. But it's an interesting discussion. For all the jokes about the park having a larger number of small, off-the-shelf coasters, it's clearly working for the park and for their visitors.