I would imagine it would be a hyper. Those numbers are for tunnel entry which is not the base of the drop. So if the tunnels low point is 20ft under ground which isnt unlikely then the drop height would be above 200ft.Booo!
(referring to the height change not Matt's post)
EDIT: It's actually not even a hyper. It's 180 feet for the drop.
Yes, but the only thing that hits even 300 feet there is Superman: Escape from Krypton. 200 feet at least has Goliath.Correct me if I’m wrong, but the West Coast doesn’t currently have a B&M Hyper Coaster at all, does it? So in that regard, it would still be a new experience for that part of the country!
not entirely, the dynamic loads from a train would need to be combined with the dynamic loads for the earthquake. There are flexibility requirements but for steel structures, it's more about ductility (Bending before fracture) than about flexibility. Keep in mind there are multiple other B&M coasters in California, and steel structures in downtown LA that are 3 times as tall as this. So Designing for earthquakes is important, and will change the design from a what it would be in, say Ohio, but it won't change the cost by more that 10% and it won't fundamentally alter the structural system.I can only imagine that they would have to design every component to be flexible
not entirely, the dynamic loads from a train would need to be combined with the dynamic loads for the earthquake. There are flexibility requirements but for steel structures, it's more about ductility (Bending before fracture) than about flexibility. Keep in mind there are multiple other B&M coasters in California, and steel structures in downtown LA that are 3 times as tall as this. So Designing for earthquakes is important, and will change the design from a what it would be in, say Ohio, but it won't change the cost by more that 10% and it won't fundamentally alter the structural system.
Wow shots fired.and will change the design from a what it would be in, say Ohio
To not read too hard into a quite hilarious Twitter response - it could simply allude to no plans having *actually* been formally submitted. But glad to known Buena Park is thumbing through those sub threads!Time to throw yet another monkey wrench into the mix;
It looks e.Someone has made a prediction of the layout, while i would love a giga it looks like a decent little hyper.