So I'm guessing I-Box for the launch (so it can be faster again), pre-drop, drop, wave turn, quad down, and the final turnaround. Those seem to be the areas with the most forces.
It will be in the places where stress on the track is prominent so I think it's likely to be those sections!So I'm guessing I-Box for the launch (so it can be faster again), pre-drop, drop, wave turn, quad down, and the final turnaround. Those seem to be the areas with the most forces.
I know this is a somewhat late reply, but if Lightning Rod is (was?) a wooden coaster, then surely Goliath at SFGAm, Wildfire at Kolmarden and Outlaw Run would be wooden coasters too? Only asking as they are all faster and taller than Wodan/Python.Lightning Rod was pretty much the only excemption from the trend that nobody builds really big, conventional wooden coasters anymore. It is the only RMC woodie without inversions, as far as I can tell, and its track was at least sort of wooden, giving it a spot on the list of giant woodies like El Toro, T-Express, and arguably Son of Beast (with the loop removed it was pretty conventional, albeit very big). With Lightning Rod's conversion into a hybrid coaster, it leaves Wodan as the tallest and fastest conventional woodie built in the 2010s, only a hair ahead of Python in Bamboo Forest (although the latter's speed is listed as 99.9 km/h, which I guess in practice makes them equally fast within a reasonable margin of error). Anyway, a speed of 100 km/h would make those two tie for 15th place on the list of fastest woodies ever built. Of the 14 before them, 8 were built before 2000 and only two after 2006 (Lightning Rod and T-Express).
They really don't make them like they used to. But then again, if a hybrid track makes a better ride experience than classic wood, I guess we shouldn't be too sad about it.
@Matt N it is the same however compared to the other Topper Track RMCs, Lighting Rod has excessive wear and tear damage on it's track due to it's high speed transitions and it's launch which puts stress on the track causing it's downtime hence why they're RMCing it!I know this is a somewhat late reply, but if Lightning Rod is (was?) a wooden coaster, then surely Goliath at SFGAm, Wildfire at Kolmarden and Outlaw Run would be wooden coasters too? Only asking as they are all faster and taller than Wodan/Python.
I’m not trying to be pedantic for the sake of it, I was only wondering what your thought process was, as LRod is/was the same ride type as Wildfire, Goliath and Outlaw Run (Topper Track, which RCDB considers wooden).
Very interesting to see this taking shape, however; seeing such a new coaster, and one which is already an RMC, getting RMC’d is incredibly interesting! Correct me if I’m wrong, but isn’t this the first time IBox Track has ever been used for a like-for-like replacement of a ride’s track as opposed to a full layout change with new elements being added?
I’m assuming it’s probably intended to be a similar colour to the Topper Track that’s currently on there; it looks pretty similar to that colour to me, at least.Black I-Box?!
Photo by Jacob Oberle on Facebook.
I said "Conventional" woodies, so all of these are disqualified by their inversions. But you could also say that both Goliath and Wildfire reach their height by means of a steel structure for the lift hill, while Outlaw Run's height is partially due to it being a terrain coaster. Then again, so is Python, but Wodan at least is built on flat land.I know this is a somewhat late reply, but if Lightning Rod is (was?) a wooden coaster, then surely Goliath at SFGAm, Wildfire at Kolmarden and Outlaw Run would be wooden coasters too? Only asking as they are all faster and taller than Wodan/Python.
I am sorry but that i box looks so sexy??Black I-Box?!
Photo by Jacob Oberle on Facebook.