Snoo said:
Xpress said:
3 words:
Lack.
Of.
Control.
So you have more control when you have a tool to do all the smoothing for you instead of doing it yourself? Ahh I see.
My problem with tools are mostly because they aren't necessary to create a great ride. I find people tend to be more lazy and unimaginative with their tracks when they tool. On top of the fact that not everyone knows how to use them, and giving someone an advantage that isn't even necessary in the first place is just lame to be honest. Plus, if you REALLY think having a silky smooth track is going to win MY comps, you got another thing coming.
If you wanna nitpick, do work! You will have a better coaster because of it. Of course, that's my opinion, I'm definitely not wrong.
Get your head out of CF, and get over to a community that advocates in the use of something other than handbuilding. Unimaginative? Lazy? You can be the same with a handbuilt track.
There is NO advantage to using a tool over handbuilding, aside from the simple fact of matter that a tool creates a lot more precise control over the element, and it's not just banking and forces, it's every single aspect of using it that creates more control. Handbuilding has its limitations, so you see people not implementing specific elements because either A. It takes wayy too long to play out the element and smooth it, shape it properly, bank it, repeat, etc etc, or B. It's just simply not possible to do by hand.
One more thing, tools ABSOLUTELY DO NOT do all the work for you, you have to put in just as much brain power and effort into them to get them to function properly. Even a program as
simple as Newton2 needs a lot of work and effort to churn out an element that is shaped properly, or banked correctly. Look at the Banana Roll Gerstlauer has implemented into their newest Eurofighter. You think you can just whip that up in 5 minutes in Newton? Sure you can, but it's not going to be anything representative of the actual ebb and flow of the real one. Would look good from a distance, but unless you actually spent a lot of time and effort working on it in Newton then it just won't ride anywhere near the same.
Will "silky smooth" tracks win competitions? Nope, absolutely not. But why tell the builder what he can build his tracks with? Should not it be up to the builder? You are contradicting yourself here. Telling us that smooth tracks won't win competitions, but that using tools is an unfair advantage to those that don't know.
Another thing, look at how many people ran their tracks through AHG or use Newton in the woodie comp. It's evident that people like using them, and KNOW how to use them, so why not let us use them?