That must be awful!!!
We get the ‘Merlin Pass’ which gets us into most parks worth visiting in the UK.
Hey I'm about to visit there next yearConey Island (NYC)
In spite of this, however, there’s one major park in Central Florida that we’ve never visited or had any strong desire to, and that’s Legoland Florida...
Don’t get me wrong, I’m sure it’s a lovely park, and I’d still visit if offered the prospect, but I certainly won’t be rushing to include it in my itinerary next time I’m in Florida. Am I missing out on a gem by not making a huge effort to visit it?
Oh, I’m sure it’s a very nice park; I had a really nice day at the Windsor park here in the UK last summer, and Florida does look like it offers some more unique elements compared to the Windsor one (not least a more extensive non-kiddie coaster selection). And funny you should say about location, because LLF is actually often closer to the places we stay than the other major parks. Being Brits on holiday in the area, Virgin Holidays allocates us an “Orlando Area Villa”, which usually ends up being in either Haines City or Davenport as opposed to Orlando itself. And in our most recent villa in 2019 (in Haines City), I do remember looking it up, and Legoland Florida was actually the closest theme park to our villa!I feel this. Even as a Central Floridian, I didn't visit the park until a year and a half ago. It just doesn't look like much on paper, especially for the price point. And then there is the fact that it is not exactly close to the other Orlando parks. It's a good haul down a road with a lot of stop lights.
That being said, it's enjoyable. It's a really solid family park, but certainly not anything a thrillseeker will overly enjoy. My first visit was a cred run and I was done in less than an hour and a half. However, there is a lot to be enjoyed at the park and it is definitely an all-day affair with kids.
So, in short, it's a neat park, but I'm not sure you're missing out on anything major.
I totally get it. Even before I went to Legoland Florida, I felt the same way about Legoland Windsor. I literally went to Windsor and had absolutely no remorse about not visiting the park because it didn't seem worth my time given that it is a global brand with locations worldwide as opposed to a more uniquely local or cultural experience such as Alton or Blackpool.Theme park-wise, we usually prefer to spend our days doing the special types of parks you can’t really get back home in the UK. And when there’s a very similar Legoland in Windsor, that’s 2 hours at most from our house, LLF doesn’t really fit with that theme.
Fair enough! It really is each to their own with this sort of thing, and while I had a nice day at LLW last summer, that's not to say that it's for everyone; correct me if I'm wrong here, Nicky, but based on some of your previous posts in this thread, I get the impression that a park has to have a decent thrill coaster selection for you to consider it especially worthwhile, and I'll digress that Legoland certainly doesn't cater to that particular demand...Still haven't been to Legoland Windsor, and no intentions to either... Nor have I any intentions of visiting Legoland Florida.
Parks aren't marketed to us, and that's just fine, they do very well as it is.
When you talk about those 3 categories, I'd personally say I sit somewhere between coaster enthusiast and theme park enthusiast. I appreciate theme parks as a whole, and coasters are not the be all and end all for me, with my interest also extending to other attractions, but coasters are comfortably the theme park attraction type that interests me most; they're the only thing I count, and they're usually the main thing I know about and aspire to ride before going to a new park.I notice that some of these answers come down to that age old question again... Are you a coaster enthusiast, theme park enthusiast or just a thrill coaster junkie...
For me I'm somewhere between coaster enthusiast and thrill coaster junkie... So parks like Energylandia, Phantasialand etc, that each have at least 3 decent thrill coasters, and good supporting coasters, will always get my money before parks like Disney and Efteling that lack any really good thrill coasters, (IMO of course, especially in the case of Efteling.)
I don’t mind at all I haven’t changed my opinion.Fair enough! It really is each to their own with this sort of thing, and while I had a nice day at LLW last summer, that's not to say that it's for everyone; correct me if I'm wrong here, Nicky, but based on some of your previous posts in this thread, I get the impression that a park has to have a decent thrill coaster selection for you to consider it especially worthwhile, and I'll digress that Legoland certainly doesn't cater to that particular demand...
Personally, I wouldn't say I'm overly anal about parks needing an amazing thrill coaster selection for me to visit and have a nice time. Sure, for a park to be a true favourite of mine, I do like it to have at least some thrilling rides that I really enjoy, but I've learned over the years that a park's coaster selection does not necessarily make or break it for me. If you don't mind, let me dredge up a post of yours from earlier in the thread (although if you'd prefer I didn't, I can remove this whole extract):
When you talk about those 3 categories, I'd personally say I sit somewhere between coaster enthusiast and theme park enthusiast. I appreciate theme parks as a whole, and coasters are not the be all and end all for me, with my interest also extending to other attractions, but coasters are comfortably the theme park attraction type that interests me most; they're the only thing I count, and they're usually the main thing I know about and aspire to ride before going to a new park.
SFDK is shockingly bad. I've only been one time but it was far and away the worst Six Flags park I've been to.It feels like Six Flags can't be bothered with SFDK most days, but I've had two days this year where most of the rides were running, so maybe, just maybe they're going to stafff the park apropriately.
if all the rides were open, it'd be a decent park, but that is generally not the case.SFDK is shockingly bad. I've only been one time but it was far and away the worst Six Flags park I've been to.
When I went I think most rides were open - but never at the same time. The only one I remember never opening was V2. However, operations were super intermittent and we only got on most things due to luck and being in the right part of the park at the right time. There are also absolutely no standout coasters compared to many other parks in the line-up.if all the rides were open, it'd be a decent park, but that is generally not the case.