Nicky Borrill
Strata Poster
That is genuinely stunning!!!
I disagree… With each installation I see on here, the theming standard looks to improve!I'm going to get shot for this...
...obviously, I quite like this, especially the station building and it's great that they've put the effort in rather than just plonking down 'generic kiddie coaster 1'. I just think we might need to tone down the lenses in our rose-tinted Paultons glasses a little bit
I completely agree, I keep wondering what I've missed?I'm going to get shot for this...
...obviously, I quite like this, especially the station building and it's great that they've put the effort in rather than just plonking down 'generic kiddie coaster 1'. I just think we might need to tone down the lenses in our rose-tinted Paultons glasses a little bit
Like they do much better: https://rcdb.com/1566.htm#p=73872Sure, it's not Disney
I have theorised that Cat-O-Pillar might be on its way out in the next few years but I doubt that'll be before the investment in the western side of the park coming next. It makes sense that they would be planning ahead and compensating for the loss of a kiddie cred in advance but they might also just want a kiddie cred in every area of the park to give families more options.I see both sides of the coin.
On the one hand, this is just a nicely themed kiddie cred. Yes, it's great to see a park - especially a UK park - theme such an addition to a high standard. But it's still an...unusual choice for a park which has plenty of kiddie creds, many themed to an acceptable standard as is, when there's lots of other parts of the park in need of attention too.
On the other hand, if this is the effort they're willing to go to for a kiddie cred, to compliment an already high effort themed land, it's exciting to wonder what effort they would be willing to go to for the next big thing, whatever and whenever that is.
I have two schools of thoughts about the investment.
1. Are they introducing another kiddie cred now because, long-term, they're thinking of removing one they currently have for a future investment? I don't really think they need another coaster of this scale, so this would be sensible long-term planning on the park's behalf?
2. Are they introducing this because early thoughts were that Tornado Springs was unbalanced? Did they get cold feet and think the core part of the area caters too much to a slightly audience, and they need something more junior to balance it up?
Obviously that second point is more hypothetical, since construction of this started before the area even opened up. Maybe it was always the plan to open this in a phase 2 sort of thing. But I still haven't quite wrapped by head round why Paultons have decided to add another kiddie cred now.