Admittedly I don’t think it looks earth-shatteringly brilliant, and I’d be more excited to ride Junker out of the two Gerstlauers (although I personally feel like I’d enjoy Thunderbird most out of the park’s coasters; gotta love a good GCI!), I still think Pitt’s Special looks like a perfectly nice ride for what it is!
I’m admittedly not sure on the name (sounds more like some fancy brand of gin than a coaster to me, but each to their own; it does actually refer to something, doesn’t it?), and it’s not the longest coaster in the world, but I think what’s there looks perfectly fine! In that POV, I saw a fair few nice pops of airtime; for all their flaws, the Gerstlauer thrill coasters I’ve done do have excellent airtime, so it’s nice to see Gerstlauer do a layout with some nice airtime elements as opposed to loads of inversions, and with their lap bar restraints, it should ride nicely! On the whole, I think it should be perfectly fine; nothing spectacular, but a good addition to PowerPark nonetheless!
Also, with regards to the shaking, that could well be down to the camera; even on rides I’ve found glass smooth, you sometimes see a lot of shaking in POVs.
I must say, though; I was under the impression that Pitt’s Special had a HangTime-style holding brake before the drop, so I must say I was surprised to see that it didn’t! I don’t know why, the shaping of the drop seemed to imply to me that it had one, as I could have sworn it had a bit of a shallow slant after cresting the lift hill like you get on HangTime & Takabisha/TMNT Shellraiser.