That's fine if you're going for the older should know better angle. I'm no film critic, I just like what I like.
They're ranked purely on how much emotional impact they have on me (the reason I watch films), not the quality of the film in the eyes of others.
Based on that thought, I don't think I want to 'know any better'.
See, there's not really an issue with "liking what you like". It's fine, and I certainly have films, music, books, etc. I adore that I know are rubbish, but they just resonate with me.
It's absolutely fine, and... We're talking Star Wars here. We're not arguing if Citizen Kane or Casablanca are the best films ever made. Or what are the failings of Hitchcock's "Rope" or "Rebecca". They're stupid, over the top, ridiculous action war films set in a completely unbelievable fictional world. They're nothing to those that enjoy them but "emotional impact" - on a very base level.
So yes, judgement based on how it makes you feel emotionally is fine. However... Even within the 7 circles of hell of Star Wars criticism, some films are just better. The direction, the script, the acting, the lack of green screen bollocks. You can still break them down and say "this film is, by all accounts and empirical measures you can have through agreement of people who 'know their **** ' " better than the other films.
Everyone is allowed a preference or an opinion, just be prepared to defend it beyond "I liked it", or accept that others will probably think you're a bit mad
In the end, Howie is wrong about his list, but being wrong will not stop him from enjoying the films in the way he enjoys them. No argument of story, character development, direction, etc. can ever change his mind. This isn't a problem, it's just one of those things and he shall ever be "that guy with the Ewok avatar"
Just thought it might have been some weird nostalgia for the originals idea, even though someone in their 20's these days is a prime candidate for having grown up with the prequels in cinema.
No, because it isn't an excuse. Well, not really... I grew up in the 70's and my Grandfather would put on films to watch. Bogart stuff mostly, but also early Westerns. Things from 30 years before I was even born. My Father showed me the stuff he loved as a teen. Steve McQueen films, Clint Eastwood spaghetti westerns, cheap sci-fi B-movies - all kinds of stuff.
I continued to adore the films of my generation too though. Star Wars, Indiana Jones, Tron (bugger off Witchfinder
) and anything kind of Spielberg/big budget through the late 70's and early/mid 80's. When I started to really get into watching films though, I found that the stuff my Grandfather and Father had me watch more than stood up to the test f time. The Maltese Falcon is better than the Goonies. It's not as fun or as memorable, but it IS better. Two Mules for Sister Mary is better than Young Guns, All About Eve better than Pretty in Pink, Magnificent Seven is not better than Star Wars
The point is, nostalgia does play a part and what you see first certainly influences you. However, we owe it to ourselves to go beyond that and to see films, ride coasters, listen to music, etc. always resetting ourselves to a default state first. Pretend you have no experience, don't bring along your baggage.
So, it shouldn't make any difference if you grew up with one thing rather than others.
*A wave of the hand*
Move along.
This was the post you were looking for!
No offence taken. In case you were wondering.
I wasn't, but now I know I'm a bit disappointed. I'll try harder in future