VonRolland
Giga Poster
Can't afford to cut the grass nevermind build an RMCAnd it was a miracle they could afford that. No way they'd be able to afford RMC anything.
Can't afford to cut the grass nevermind build an RMCAnd it was a miracle they could afford that. No way they'd be able to afford RMC anything.
What incident happened the other weekTalocan has been dismantled at Phantasialand. Click-baits articles are already appearing saying it's being demolished whereas its most likely to be Huss inspecting the components for cracks and damages after the incident the other week.
View attachment 32868
On June 19th, it had to be e-stopped and riders evacuated after the gondola started swaying and moving awkwardly during the ride cycle.What incident happened the other week
NEW HUGE ENTRANCE PORTAL
NEW INFORMATION
NEW TOWER RENTAL
NEW BEAUTIFUL CAFE
NEW EXCITING SHOPS
NEW TOILET FACILITIES - including brand new disabled facilities
EVEN LARGER OUTDOOR DINING AREA BY THE DINING ROOM
Oh that makes me mad.Seen this doing the rounds online so thought I'd post it here.
Disney World is arguing a man cannot sue it over the death of his wife because of terms he signed up to in a free trial of Disney+.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c8jl0ekjr0go
That's what I saw from digging further as well. Although I read that that although the restaurant is independent it's still Disney that's responsible for recruitment, hiring and training the staff? If so then it would still fall on them. Regardless, it goes to show how important food safety training is as cross contamination can happen so easily if they're not paying attention or don't have the proper procedures in place and in this case it resulted in someone dying.Yeah I've seen that in a number of places (not just the BBC) with that clickbait headline about Disney+.
But digging a bit into it, it seems the objection (well, the "agree to arbitration" clause) was more based on them buying a ticket to DisneyWorld that day instead?
But even more than that, it was the Raglan Road place at Disney Springs (who are independent operators) anyway, rather than it even being a "Disney Restaurant" - so they are really suing them (possibly as well as Disney?)
Anyway, good clickbait headline none the less!
That's what I saw from digging further as well. Although I read that that although the restaurant is independent it's still Disney that's responsible for recruitment, hiring and training the staff? If so then it would still fall on them. Regardless, it goes to show how important food safety training is as cross contamination can happen so easily if they're not paying attention or don't have the proper procedures in place and in this case it resulted in someone dying.
As for the arbitration clause, it does seem like it was from the Epcot ticket they purchased, but the fact it's also in the terms for Disney+ as well is a bit nuts.
Looking back at previous incidents and lawsuits it does seem to be quite common for Disney and Universal to settle claims through arbitration. Not only is it quicker and cheaper but the main reason they seem to push for it is for their reputation as it's all settled privately rather than publicly through a court of law.
The user who sells the coaster also sells three other rides from Schwaben Park:Nid des Marsupilamis at Parc Spirou Province is for sale.
Achterbahn - 25 Meter hoch - Der "Eyecatcher" für jeden Freizeitpark
Verkauft wird eine ganz spezielle Achterbahn mit einem individuellen Konzept. Die Achterbahn benötigt lediglich eine Grundfläche von 7m x 19m ist aber 25 Meter hoch: Roller Ball. Die Anlage wird aktuell in einem süddeutschen Freizeitpark betrieben und kann dort besichtigt werden. Hersteller: RES...www.schausteller.de
The photo shows Wilde Hilde but the opening date & height matches that of Nid.