This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
yeah I would say neither Nemesis nor Maverick are small coasters. they're both pretty major installations. i feel like what we're looking for here is unexpectedly intense rides. i doubt that you go into Nemesis or Maverick thinking "this will be relaxing"
Colorado Adventure. Kinda a medium sized cred, yes it has 3 lift hills but it's no B&M or woodie, plus it's essentially a mine train. That thing has more force that a lot of substantial creds though.
The ****ing Zacspins as well, they aren't much bigger than a mouse, worse than most though
Storm Chaser kind of squeaks by at 2,600 ft. in length and 100 ft. tall; but I'll throw Green Lantern First Flight at SFMM out there. (It doesn't get more compact than a vertically stacked layout!). I really enjoyed the strong pops of airtime on that Zacspin, and the train flipping can get real in the second half.
In its early days, the Green Lantern was one of only two coasters that ever felt overwhelmingly intense to me. (I say early days because it looks as if they’ve slowed it down these days.)
In its early days, the Green Lantern was one of only two coasters that ever felt overwhelmingly intense to me. (I say early days because it looks as if they’ve slowed it down these days.)
Yeah, I’ve ridden two 4D Jokers, and they were like kiddie rides compared to the intensity of SFMM’s Green Lantern. But it used to be that you could just watch it and see it spinning and flopping in an insane manner. Now when I watch vids it looks so much more stable, with fewer and far less violent rotations.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.