TPoseOnTantrum
Giga Poster
Probably, yesI'm thinking about this too much now, aren't I?
Probably, yesI'm thinking about this too much now, aren't I?
Well i was bored this morning so i did something completely pointless
Merlin has bought many B&M's over the years so thought I'd look how they compare
Average Height Of A B&M Wing Coaster = 42.95m
Average Height Of A Merlin B&M Wing Coaster = 37.23m
Percentage = 86.68%
Average Length Of A B&M Wing Coaster = 979.26m
Average Length Of A Merlin B&M Wing Coaster = 772.37m
Percentage = 78.87%
Average Height Of A B&M Dive Coaster = 53.66m
Average Height Of A Merlin B&M Dive Coaster = 46.13m
Percentage = 85.96%
Average Length Of A B&M Dive Coaster = 757.05m
Average Length Of A Merlin B&M Dive Coaster = 471.5m
Percentage = 62.28%
Average Height Of A B&M Flying Coaster = 37.27m
Average Height Of A Merlin B&M Flying Coaster = 20m
Percentage = 53.66%
Average Length Of A B&M Flying Coaster = 936.92m
Average Length Of A Merlin B&M Flying Coaster = 840m
Percentage = 89.66%
Average Height Of A B&M Inverted Coaster = 36.76m
Average Height Of A Merlin B&M Inverted Coaster = 21m
Percentage = 57.12%
Average Length Of A B&M Inverted Coaster = 917.01m
Average Length Of A Merlin B&M Inverted Coaster = 733m
Percentage = 79.93%
Now if we combine allthose percentages the average Merlin B&M is 70.86% as tall as the average B&M in general and 77.69% as long
So if we take the B&M mega coasters stats below and apply the percentages above
Average Height Of A B&M Mega Coaster = 67.91m
Average Length Of A B&M Mega Coaster = 1521.25m
Predicted Height of a Merlin B&M Mega Coaster = 48.13m (157.9ft)
Predicted Length of a Merlin B&M Mega Coaster = 1181.79m (3877.27ft)
Right I don't think anyone can argue with any of that
Proof it wont be as tall as everyone hopes.
Now forget you read all that and enjoy the rest of your day
I'm not offended at all, in fact based on some of my behaviour in this thread, I think that's a very fair thing to say.I enjoyed reading your reasons Matt, they were well thought out and well written. But I hope I don’t offend you by saying that in those reasons, you do seem to be struggling with tunnel vision a little.
I get what you mean buddy. I think it’s almost confirmation bias…I'm not offended at all, in fact based on some of my behaviour in this thread, I think that's a very fair thing to say.
I think regardless of who you are, what you're like or what you want, it can sometimes be very easy to twist things or exaggerate their importance to fit your desired narrative when you really want something, even if you're not necessarily intending to. I'll admit that I can sometimes be privy to doing that without realising it (I never intend to do it, but I do sometimes get a bit carried away with excitement!); let me assure you that I certainly don't intend to manipulate people or twist things to fit my own preferences, but I think when you want something a lot, you can sometimes gloss over the detractors from points almost sub-consciously, and focus only on the boosters. I think your term "tunnel vision" is a very good way of putting it from my standpoint, to be honest; it's not that I intend to manipulate people to push a certain narrative or anything, but I think I sometimes have a tendency to get carried away and gloss over the detractors from some points!
Do you get what I mean?
But on a project note; my personal prediction is still B&M Hyper Coaster that will break the UK height record.
Question; is it known whether Thorpe are holding actual in-person meetings for this consultation where the plans will be formally revealed, or are they merely dropping the plans onto the website when the calendar hits 10th December?
Interesting... are there any local enthusiasts living near enough to Thorpe to qualify? I do understand why Merlin want to limit it, though; locals might feel a bit intimidated and unable to raise their genuine concerns if it's overrun by enthusiasts.There doing public consultations on the 9th, but I’ve been lead to believe they’ll only be allowing locals in and will be requiring proof of local address. I believe this is simply to stop the important process being flooded with vloggers looking to get the scoop first.
you know you're in for a good time when threads like these start snowballing. nostalgia for the FLY wall days.
Just for some more perspective...
Look how tight that turnaround would need to be to fit a mako drop in, from slammer, and then cut back to behind saw...
I'm not sure a mako style turnaround would work here... Maybe a different, highup turn, to kill the energy off before banking passengers into a complete blackout, but not a mako turn...
Say you don't want a Hyper without saying you don't want a Hyper challenge!good thinking, Tell me which B&Ms have at least a 140 degree turnaround immediately after the drop, and I'll have a play around...
Diamondback is 365m to it's turnaround... We don't have that much length to play with.
If you’re going to quote me, don’t cut off the part that doesn’t fit with your agenda!Say you don't want a Hyper without saying you don't want a Hyper challenge!
Looks great, a clever use of the space… And that turnaround looks incredible.I've been following this thread with great interest, and having delved into learning NoLimits 2 over the past months, I've been eager to use those skills for something interesting. So inspired by @CrashCoaster's joke about a shorter, Skyrush-esque B&M hyper for Thorpe - along with other posts in this thread - I've taken on the challenge of fitting such a coaster into the Loggers Leap/Old Town footprint (with the station/brake run in Slammer's plot). For good measure, this layout nabs the 'tallest in the UK' record at 218 feet/66 meters tall, reaches speeds of 77mph/124kmh, and is 4370 feet/1332 meters long. Here's the result:
And here's how it fits into Thorpe (blue arrows signify direction of travel):
I know it's not precisely B&M's style, as this layout is a bit more aggressive and twisted than their usual hypers, but my goal was to test if fitting a hyper in Old Town/Loggers Leap's plot was theoretically possible: bottom line, it definitely is. I've really enjoyed all this ongoing speculation and rumors so far, so hopefully I've managed to contribute something decent here.
Has to be said, I'd much rather a second rate hyper than the alternative... I've only ever heard horror stories about RMC operations, and as it stands I think their layouts are quite overrated, barring a couple of examples. I'm more than ready to be proven wrong on both counts, though!If you’re going to quote me, don’t cut off the part that doesn’t fit with your agenda!
I absolutely do want a hyper, IF it can be done in a way that makes it as good as Shambhala or close… If it’s going to be a second rate hyper, I’d rather they use the space and money for something better.
Yep, it does. F2.Does NL2 still allow you to show the forces throughout the ride?
There are far more alternatives than an RMC (though an RMC would in fairness be my favourite alternative.) Intamin hypers for example, would be a preference for me, over ANY B&M hyper... I'd even prefer a good Intamin Blitz to a second rate B&M... Hell, look at my top 10, I'd even prefer a Mack Extreme Spinner... But you'll also see Shambhala in there... If it's anything close to Shammy it will be amazing!!! If it's more Silver Star, it will be just 'ok' imo, and that will be a shame. Don't get me wrong, I know I sound really spoilt and entitled here, and I'm sure I'll still love it, may even still make my UK number 1 after all this negativity. But it will just be a huge shame, given the possibilities available.Has to be said, I'd much rather a second rate hyper than the alternative... I've only ever heard horror stories about RMC operations, and as it stands I think their layouts are quite overrated, barring a couple of examples. I'm more than ready to be proven wrong on both counts, though!
Yep, it does. F2.