I mean, the best indicator here is that it only has one train even though they could have easily run 2 if they wanted. Now it's probably a little to costly to modify the ride appropiately.Does Booster Bike REALLY draw in crowds, though? Troy, I can understand, but Booster Bike... no.
Can't understand the BB shaming, guys.
the ugly duckling of the park and has bad capacity.
I am not a fan of the riding position
The Layout is nothing special
Just how they made the Zero-G-Roll taller than the airtime hill even though it comes later, because it's in the background, and they want both "phoenix flies over water"-maneuvers to be as visible as possible. That alone is so much greatness.
Booster Bike is terrible for three simple reasons:
1) It's not Tron.
2) It's terrible.
3) IT'S. NOT. TRON.
Booster Bike is terrible for three simple reasons:
1) It's not Tron.
2) It's terrible.
3) IT'S. NOT. TRON.
Just because it was first doesn't mean it's any good...If Vekoma didnt develop boosterbike there would be no Tron. And because there is now a better version that does instantly
1) If Vekoma didnt develop the boosterbike there would be no Tron.
2) Because there is now a better version of it, that instanly means that this coaster is bad?
3) Its very hard to replace that coaster cause of small place.
I would also add that there might be a slight perspective trick going on here too. In the footage I've seen the zero-g is in the foreground, meaning it will probably look a little taller than the airtime hill. Also, the trajectories are based on the train's center of mass, so the track for a zero-g is likely to be a bit higher than that of a straight airtime hill, all other things being equal.I mean... I'm pretty sure it's taller because the airtime hill provides airtime however the zero-g has to hold 0g and be somewhat parabolic. And because it hasn't lost a great deal of speed, that height is needed.
@Ethan There are so much more tones between Black and White in this world. Believe me or not - personally I am able to like or even love a ride, even if it is not the best and newest one. There are things I don't like (that much) with BB, but it is not a reason to blame the whole experience, especially when for me the fun still outweighs them.
You state Phantasialand as your favourite Park. There is another great example: the temple. We all now about the state and it makes me sad. BUT I still love to ride it. It is still a good ride with good characteristics, especially considering its age. And I know it from its Space Center ages.
@Ben If you are referring to me then I would ask you to show a little bit more respect in chosing your words. There is no need and value in getting personal and insulting. Considering rides and its perception there never will be the one and only "truth". Everyone is different and thus his/her perception and preferences.
It is legitimate to think different, but pointing fingers and beeing unpolite is not.