Matt N
CF Legend
Hi guys. Immersion is a big part of theme parks, particularly in the case of some of the bigger names like Disney and Universal, and one commonly used technique to immerse riders into the story of an attraction is the pre-show. Quite a few immersive attractions start by placing guests in front of a video (or similar) to explain the attraction's story, and sometimes, an attraction can even have multiple pre-shows. With this in mind, I'd be keen to know; what are your thoughts on pre-shows? Do you like them and think they add loads to an attraction? Or do you not like them and think they're a waste of time? Or do you think it depends on the context?
Personally, I think it depends on the context. Certain attractions really benefit from the additional plot exposition that pre-shows provide; as an example, I'd say that on Hex at Alton Towers, and many other similar madhouse rides, the pre-shows really enhance the experience. I'd also say the same for the Harry Potter rides at Universal; these pre-shows really enhance the experience and feel like a worthwhile addition.
However, I don't think pre-shows are necessarily needed in every context. For instance, I don't think big thrill coasters without much of an onus on story during the ride necessarily need pre-shows; don't get me wrong, I really like the pre-show on Wicker Man at Alton Towers, but I don't think it's necessarily needed in the context of what the ride is.
I also think that pre-shows can sometimes feel excessive or counterintuitive. Two key examples of where I'd say this was the case for me are Flight of Passage at Disney's Animal Kingdom and Fast & Furious: Supercharged at Universal Studios Florida. Flight of Passage felt like it had a very long build-up to the actual ride, with the pre-show where the guests have to randomly wiggle about in particular feeling unnecessary, in my view, and Fast & Furious felt like it had a very long pre-ride build-up prior to the ride itself that didn't really add an awful lot for me.
But what are your thoughts on pre-shows? Do you like them, do you dislike them, or does your opinion on them depend on the context?
Personally, I think it depends on the context. Certain attractions really benefit from the additional plot exposition that pre-shows provide; as an example, I'd say that on Hex at Alton Towers, and many other similar madhouse rides, the pre-shows really enhance the experience. I'd also say the same for the Harry Potter rides at Universal; these pre-shows really enhance the experience and feel like a worthwhile addition.
However, I don't think pre-shows are necessarily needed in every context. For instance, I don't think big thrill coasters without much of an onus on story during the ride necessarily need pre-shows; don't get me wrong, I really like the pre-show on Wicker Man at Alton Towers, but I don't think it's necessarily needed in the context of what the ride is.
I also think that pre-shows can sometimes feel excessive or counterintuitive. Two key examples of where I'd say this was the case for me are Flight of Passage at Disney's Animal Kingdom and Fast & Furious: Supercharged at Universal Studios Florida. Flight of Passage felt like it had a very long build-up to the actual ride, with the pre-show where the guests have to randomly wiggle about in particular feeling unnecessary, in my view, and Fast & Furious felt like it had a very long pre-ride build-up prior to the ride itself that didn't really add an awful lot for me.
But what are your thoughts on pre-shows? Do you like them, do you dislike them, or does your opinion on them depend on the context?