furie said:
Maybe somebody could ask an experienced airline pilot? Maybe they already did? Maybe it's really not very complicated at all and the investigators really just need to find the black box to confirm themost logical solution? Maybe somebody wrote down a logical explanation?
Maybe...
http://www.wired.com/autopia/2014/03/mh ... ical-fire/
A major flaw with this theory:
The plane reportedly flew for an additional 6-7 hours after making last contact. A fire which is able to knock out the communicative systems may cause the crew to succumb to smoke, but surely a fire that intense would have crippled the jet much sooner? From past experience, fires spread pretty quickly in a plane and can shut down many vital systems in a matter of minutes. A SwissAir plane crashed in 1998 approximately 25 minutes after an in-flight fire was identified. In 1987, a South African 747 crashed about 15 minutes after a fire was detected in the hold.
I also think had it crashed into the sea around the airport proposed by that article, we would have seen evidence of a crash by this point. Even though it took two years to find that Air France wreckage, they could confirm a crash within a week because parts such as lifejackets, seat cushions, the tail fin, float. With a search team as large as the one they've got going, I think they should have found something by this point.
One of the pilots, my guess, the co-pilot has almost certainly hijacked the plane. Since 9/11, passenger hijackings just don't happen anymore. Cockpit doors are now heavily reinforced and even an attempt to break it down would instantly alarm the pilots and they'd declare an emergency. The complete radio silence means that whoever hijacked the plane knew which systems to switch off and how to do so, and also knew how to fly the 777.
Why didn't any passengers detect anything wrong and try and make contact with anyone outside the plane? The pilot flying could have easily made a PA announcement declaring a [fabricated] emergency, meaning the plane will be landing elsewhere/making an alteration of the route. That would eliminate some suspicion within the passengers and cabin crew. The other pilot was probably incapacitated, possibly killed by this point.
Why did one of the pilots hijack the plane?
Some have mentioned the pilot was hired by an organisation to steal the plane for them. Slightly implausible but I guess so would the idea of two planes being deliberately flown into the WTC would have seen ridiculous fifteen years ago. Another idea I have is that the first officer and captain may have had a poor working relationship, perhaps the captain berated something he'd done on a prior flight or in the first 40 minutes of MH370, co-pilot's pride gets wounded, takes the plane his own way to fulfill some ego-driven desire for control essentially. This is just speculation but I believe poor relationships between pilots was a factor in a case of pilot suicide in the past (Egypt Air flight 990) so I wouldn't say it's completely ridiculous.
As for the outcome: I think it's crashed into some mountainous area along the Malaysia -> Kazakhstan arc which they're searching on. Either through running out of fuel or flying low to avoid radar and hitting the mountain. As I said before if it crashed in the sea I think there would have been signs of it happening by now, a terrestrial crash, particularly ones in obscure/isolated mountain areas are much more difficult to locate.
Good luck to the investigators getting much off the black box as well. If the pilot switched off both ACARS and the transponder, he's likely clicked the circuit breakers for the flight data/cockpit voice recorders.
EDIT: Those wondering why the plane didn't show up on ground radar may want to read this article about the aircraft flying in the 'shadow' of another 777 in the area. I'm not 100% convinced this is what happened but some of it seems plausible. Those backing the 'pilot was hired to fly the plane to an undisclosed location' theory should note that an incredibly fortunate turn of events/considerable eventuality planning would be required to pull off what this post suggests.
http://mh370shadow.com/post/79838944823/did-malaysian-airlines-370-disappear-using-sia68-sq68