JoshC.
Strata Poster
Interesting, especially given that the length provided there is the same. Could be a typo or something, or perhaps some different measuring metric.
In any case, I'd be surprised if 201ft is the correct number, simply by virtue of the fact it's not a commonly used number. If it was accurate, one would think that it would have been picked up on at some point (especially given it's had records, etc). Admittedly, that's terrible reasoning, given I'm just saying "it can't be right because it's always been something else", so I'm not wholly convinced there.
Be interesting if anyone has any more insight here.
If here you're suggesting the length of the lift hill, it wouldn't be that. The length of the lift hill track will be strictly greater than the height of the lift hill (think of it in terms of Pythagoras' Theorem; the lift hill is effectively the hypotenuse of a right angle triangle).maybe they're talking about the amount of lift hill track, for instance.
In any case, I'd be surprised if 201ft is the correct number, simply by virtue of the fact it's not a commonly used number. If it was accurate, one would think that it would have been picked up on at some point (especially given it's had records, etc). Admittedly, that's terrible reasoning, given I'm just saying "it can't be right because it's always been something else", so I'm not wholly convinced there.
Be interesting if anyone has any more insight here.