JoshC.
Strata Poster
Alton Towers should probably make sure they get someone to
P
R
O
O
F
R
E
A
D
sign designs...
P
R
O
O
F
R
E
A
D
sign designs...
The updated park map has removed it completely, so if it is ever coming back it won’t be anytime soon.I believe there was an electrical fire on the train so a lot of new parts were needed. There is speculation the ride might leave in the coming years so I would imagine the park were thinking about removing it. Some shipping crates from Mack were seen next to the ride a few weeks ago so I'm guessing some parts have finally arrived
I don't think that people with mobility issues make up the bulk of RAP users these days. The service is now used far more by people with hidden disabilities (e.g. autism, ADHD), and the considerable rise in diagnoses of these conditions has resulted in vastly increased RAP usage in recent years. The RAP queues aren't full with people who have a mobility-based reason for being unable to queue, they're full of people who have psychological reasons for being unable to queue (for instance, people who don't understand the concept of delayed gratification, or people who get distressed in queues for whatever reason). That is likely why the people in the RAP queue didn't appear to be in a worse state mobility-wise than your mother-in-law.I have a question around RAP, given it was so busy (and actually 'full') on Sunday. Now, I think RAP is objectively a good thing as it allows those who otherwise wouldn't be able to the opportunity to enjoy parks and rides, no argument there. My question is, are there really that many people who need it? Now, I visited with my Mother-in-Law who has pain in her knees but was able to queue all day, though looking at the RAP queues it didn't seem like many people were in any worse a situation. Obviously I know not every disability is visible, but I can't see the numbers adding up. Are some people taking the piss? If not, fair enough and I'll retract the comment but it's hardly fair on those of us who have to queue, and even more unfair on those who genuinely need RAP who now have to queue for 10-15 minutes at the RAP entrance.
As I understand it, RAP should be for those with limited mobility, or those who standing for long durations is painful, and as someone who wants rides to be available to as many people as possible I really do like the concept.
Additionally, did nobody at Alton look at the R.A.P.E. sign for Wicker Man and not notice it? I saw it immediately as I got off the ride, and have since seen it on here and on other socials. That's a Susan Album Party level blunder.
It sounds like you might not have fully grasped the concept of not every disability being visible.I have a question around RAP, given it was so busy (and actually 'full') on Sunday. Now, I think RAP is objectively a good thing as it allows those who otherwise wouldn't be able to the opportunity to enjoy parks and rides, no argument there. My question is, are there really that many people who need it? Now, I visited with my Mother-in-Law who has pain in her knees but was able to queue all day, though looking at the RAP queues it didn't seem like many people were in any worse a situation. Obviously I know not every disability is visible, but I can't see the numbers adding up. Are some people taking the piss? If not, fair enough and I'll retract the comment but it's hardly fair on those of us who have to queue, and even more unfair on those who genuinely need RAP who now have to queue for 10-15 minutes at the RAP entrance.
As I understand it, RAP should be for those with limited mobility, or those who standing for long durations is painful, and as someone who wants rides to be available to as many people as possible I really do like the concept.
Additionally, did nobody at Alton look at the R.A.P.E. sign for Wicker Man and not notice it? I saw it immediately as I got off the ride, and have since seen it on here and on other socials. That's a Susan Album Party level blunder.
I have grasped it, and totally understand that there are people with additional needs that aren't visible or immediately obvious. My post wasn't intended to come across as nasty or misunderstanding of those with needs, it's the numbers that I am questioning.It sounds like you might not have fully grasped the concept of not every disability being visible.
Also, the RAP is not a free form of fast track. After we've been on a ride we have to wait the queue time of that ride before we can rock up to the next. What's unfair about that exactly?
As someone who falls into the "physically disabled" bracket - I'll admit that yes I have struggled a bit more in recent years with RAP queues. But that's life. I don't expect a red carpet rolled out for me everywhere I go. I'm no more a priority than someone who struggles mentally with queueing. I just visit parks when I assume they're going to be quieter. Most of the time that works out.
Really good summary that Matt.I don't think that people with mobility issues make up the bulk of RAP users these days. The service is now used far more by people with hidden disabilities (e.g. autism, ADHD), and the considerable rise in diagnoses of these conditions has resulted in vastly increased RAP usage in recent years. The RAP queues aren't full with people who have a mobility-based reason for being unable to queue, they're full of people who have psychological reasons for being unable to queue (for instance, people who don't understand the concept of delayed gratification, or people who get distressed in queues for whatever reason). That is likely why the people in the RAP queue didn't appear to be in a worse state mobility-wise than your mother-in-law.
In recent seasons, the system has proved problematic in terms of the queues it causes. The RAP queues have now often become bonafide queues in themselves on peak days, which has resulted in complaints from both RAP users and those in the main queues. Merlin did attempt to rectify this for the 2024 season by introducing RAP pre-booking and limiting the number of RAP slots, but this didn't work because the system went online many hours earlier than they had originally said it would. As such, numerous people who had tickets booked for opening weekend complained that they were unable to get RAP and threatened to sue Merlin for discrimination, so Merlin had to renege on this and allow people to get RAP without pre-booking on opening weekend.
I'd imagine that RAP queues might grow a little less crowded in future as the new booking system beds in a little and the initial teething problems are ironed out.
It's impossible, and not something Merlin should even begin to think about tackling in this age of more and more litigation.That's exactly why I avoid peak days, opening weekends or any "events". Even then I didn't even know RAP queues could reach 2 hours. That's insane if true. I struggled with them a little at Towers a couple of years back, and most of those were 10 minutes max on a quiet weekday in June. If I saw a 1-2 hour RAP queue I'd be asking for a refund. I just couldn't.
If the system is being abused, how are they going to prove it and better gatekeep it? As it stands, you don't just walk into any park and get handed these passes on a silver platter on demand. You have to submit evidence in advance and be approved. Everyone using it has to have submitted some form of evidence. I have wheelbarrows full of potential evidence I could send over So if someone has supporting documents, how on earth do they then tell the difference between someone like myself, and someone that just "technically" qualifies. I don't think it's possible... Quick medical exam by a resident neurologist before they hand the pass over? (Other medical fields are available... I just went with my problematic... area)
They've had the timeout system for a long time. But it was done the wrong way around IMO. How I believe it worked at Towers was that you'd join the RAP queue, then get 'timed out' for the stated queue time, so you couldn't ride anything else in that time.I don’t know much but I always thought RAP might work best as a Six Flags style ‘wait 80%-100% of the posted queue length outside of the queue / one electronic booking at a time / then return at the time slot’ sort of thing… it wouldn’t mean that people who can’t endure a queue don’t have to queue… but there is also less of an incentive to ‘exploit’ it, maybe?
Again… I don’t know much…
Because, even when they do timeout properly, (which they don’t always, lets be honest,) people game the system, as mentioned previously. They have multiple RAPs per group, or they’ll join normal queues (you know, the ones they have said they can’t cope with,) whilst timed out.At one point the Merlin parks did have it so that you could only ride with one person using RAP, it just didn't work if you were in a group of people unfortunately. The whole "have your friends wait in the queue and try and get on the same train" theory was an absolute ball-ache in practise. If I'm not mistaken that system only lasted a couple of seasons before the number of carers/guests went back up to 3.
BPB had the same "one carer" rule during my last visit and it just resulted in our group being split up for most of the day. It didn't ruin the day completely but it would have been a lot nicer to have the day together as a group.
I don't quite understand the desire that people have to "blag" an RAP at any park. There was a time at the Merlin parks before they started doing the "time out" thing where you'd be free to ride anything as often as you liked, but now you don't actually "skip" any queues... so what do these people actually think they're getting out of it?
Because, even when they do timeout properly, (which they don’t always, lets be honest,) people game the system, as mentioned previously. They have multiple RAPs per group, or they’ll join normal queues (you know, the ones they have said they can’t cope with,) whilst timed out.