Eh well I like when it's longer usually. Which is why New Texas giant ranks higher than Iron Rattler for me. But I do have to agree that wicked cyclone had absolutely no airtime at the end, but still an extra ride length is at least good for coasters that would otherwise be too short.Just because something is 200ft tall doesn't mean its not going to become a meandering mess by the end. Wicked Cyclone, for instance, could have ended one loop sooner (it loops upon itself 3 times I think) and would probably be better off for it.. and it would probably be carrying the same speed depending on how they finished off.
Their BEST creations, at least in my opinion, tend to be "BANG BANG BANG YOURE WELCOME" while the longer rides tend to "BANG BANG Well ok. That was cool. BANG. I mean.. cool? Why? BANG"
Good comparisons would be Lightning Rod (which will most likely be the same speed of this ride) in comparison to NTG. Hyde's video on the previous page is a great example. I'd rather be FLYING into the brakes after a fantastic ride that could have maybe been longer then crawling into the brakes on a longer ride that could have been shorter.
If I were a betting man, I would envision New Mean Streak making the same three laps as the old Mean Streak made.While I completely agree with you @Snoo, I just can't see CP going the shorter route for this. It's Cedar Point, they're most likely going for the length record.
I have a feeling that Cedar Fair is going big with Mean Streak, and then going smaller and shorter with Hurler.
Eh well I like when it's longer usually. Which is why New Texas giant ranks higher than Iron Rattler for me. But I do have to agree that wicked cyclone had absolutely no airtime at the end, but still an extra ride length is at least good for coasters that would otherwise be too short.
Sent from my Moto G (4) using Tapatalk
My thoughts exactly.For some reason I really hate the look of the descent from that hill. It's as if a new to No Limits user :emoji_zipper_mouth:ed up with the banking. I have faith in RMC completely, but in terms of visual aspect, I ain't a fan.
You're absolutely right, they do all ride very, very well. BUT... there are some of these elements (the off-axis hills I mentioned above) where I do think the ride would be better without them.Yeah but the thing with RMC is, the elements may look ugly, but they ride :emoji_zipper_mouth:ing amazingly.
And that looks absolutely amazing.
Oh piss off you, with your opinions...Well the off-axis airtime hills are amazing (Iron Rattler's is just taken too slow) so, you're wrong