Slayed
Hyper Poster
It *could* have been a really good little film. The basic premise is fine, the actors do a good job, and the FX are subtle and effective.LiveForTheLaunch said:IS NOT! It was soo creepy! What ending was played in your theatre though, just out of curiousity? Because there are multiple endings, and I've seen them both, and one is just stupid whereas the other is pretty scary.
But really, I think you actually have to have a belief in the paranormal to really think it's scary. Even so though, yes the beginning might drag, but I don't get what isn't creepy about it .
But they botch it terribly with the writing. The slow start was expected, but it quickly falls into a repetitive pattern that soon gets boring, the internal logic is missing and the escalation of events is mishandled.
With a bit more creative investment it could have been exciting (e.g. do the people have no friends or family that can help? Why waste the "exorcist"?). Instead it stumbles through meaningless scenes to a "shock" ending, just like Blair Witch (for once Ollie is right - Blair Witch sucks donkey arse).
Oh, and the only significant twist is given away in the first 15 minutes! What a waste.
To see this costs the same as seeing 2012. There is no comparison - this belongs on TV, 2012 on the biggest screen you can find.