@JoshC. I think you're completely talking nonsense.
"Universally appreciated elements" don't exist first of all. As to speed is relative (From the top 10 fastest coasters you'll almost never see 8 of them in people's favourites), the sensation of airtime is relative (can't find a ranking of most airtime), intense ride experience is relative, etc.... And btw... who even cares about inversions today, there are plenty of non-inverting elements delivering as much, or even more thrills. (Rollercoasters with more than 3-5 inversions are most of the time not good and don't come anywhere close in people's top 10's)
But getting into detail (so going further from your assumptions).
The speed of FLY could be close to 100kph (as fast as, or even faster than plenty of launch coasters which are seen as good)
The entire experience can pretty much be as intense as any other coaster, just because of the fact you are in a flying position instead of a "relax" sitting position.
The only of your aspects that will really miss in this coaster is airtime, as a flying coaster just can't get that in a good way. (Altough weightlessness in itself can be achieved, which is kinda like airtime)
Oh and well... it has inversions
Also. Flying coasters can't be good => Flying dinosaur is nr 19 on Captain Coaster atm and Eejanaika is 11 (which isn't a flying coaster, but also a coaster type which was hated upon a lot)
I'm not saying this coaster will be better than anything else or even that it'll be good at all. I'm just saying that you can't say from some coaster type, rails and a wall how a coaster will be. We don't know anything about that at all.
In fact I do agree with Brian that it has more potential than Taron as a total package. (Taron without themeing wouldn't be a top 20 coaster)