Hyde244 said:^ How crowded was the park? I visited SFMM a number of times over the past year, and Tatsu was always running both sides of the station. Same for X2.
SFMM follows a policy of changing the number of trains-on-the-track and status of station operation, dependent on park attendance and line wait for rides. This is similar to many amusement parks throughout the U.S.
Hyde244 said:^ How crowded was the park? I visited SFMM a number of times over the past year, and Tatsu was always running both sides of the station. Same for X2.
SFMM follows a policy of changing the number of trains-on-the-track and status of station operation, dependent on park attendance and line wait for rides. This is similar to many amusement parks throughout the U.S.
Intricks said:Hyde244 said:^ How crowded was the park? I visited SFMM a number of times over the past year, and Tatsu was always running both sides of the station. Same for X2.
SFMM follows a policy of changing the number of trains-on-the-track and status of station operation, dependent on park attendance and line wait for rides. This is similar to many amusement parks throughout the U.S.
Lets see, for the 2+ train op rides the day I went:
Goliath - 1hr
Ninja - 1hr
Viper - roughly 20 minutes (others were waiting 45 minutes. Yay for that unique queue line)
X2 - 90 minites gove or take
Green Lantern - roughly 1hr
The rest were all 1 train:
Tatsu - Bordering 3hrs! They had to bring in extra gate JUST to make sure nobody tried cutting the line! Cattle pens were open and full
Superman - Granted it was only 1 side, but still a 2hr wait, if not more
Apocalypse - 90 minutes
Scream! and Riddler's Revenger were going on 2 hours.
Colossus - 1 to 2 hour wait.
Now, as to how busy the park was? I would say around Half the max capacity based on the parking lot when I left.
Seriously though, no **** excuse for that kind of **** operations.
2012Jarrett said:I was thinking about this the other day, and had a crazy idea. It would require butchering at least one hill, but could they maybe do a zero-g roll where one train rolls over onto the other track and the other does the same under it? It would require some major support work but MAN would it be cool.
Hope the way I worded that made sense...
2012Jarrett said:I was thinking about this the other day, and had a crazy idea. It would require butchering at least one hill, but could they maybe do a zero-g roll where one train rolls over onto the other track and the other does the same under it? It would require some major support work but MAN would it be cool.
Hope the way I worded that made sense...
That's an understatement!marc said:I don't think the park needs another inverting coaster