They're at it again...You gotta admire Maurer for still trying with the Spike coaster concept, if nothing else.
...this time it's a Spike Jet Ski interactive coaster concept.
They're at it again...You gotta admire Maurer for still trying with the Spike coaster concept, if nothing else.
You gotta admire Maurer for still trying with the Spike coaster concept, if nothing else.
oh so you found one not in maintenance?Yeah, after experiencing a Spike coaster, I no longer even admire Mairer for still trying it...
In the era where compact launch coasters and larger family coasters are all the rage it truly is bewildering why Maurer doesn't go back to it's X-train coaster like Dragon Legend here in the video and refine the product a little and start marketing it again. We know they can make normal capacity rollercoasters, they just for some reason choose not to.Can they not develop a new family coaster concept or something?!




www.instagram.com
They need to give up on this concept and make more of theeesssseeeeeThey're at it again...
...this time it's a Spike Jet Ski interactive coaster concept.![]()
Feels like they've sunk too much into R&D and need to recoup the costs, don't see that happening anytime soon even with all the cruise spike coastersI’m baffled at why Maurer continues down the road of Spike Coasters when they’re evidently rubbish… or why any parks bought them after seeing the early prototypes, for that matter!
This seems like an age where Maurer’s spinning coasters and X-Cars could sell quite well, yet they continue to peddle this model over either of those arguably much better bets… I don’t understand the logic.
This.... they've sunk too much into R&D and need to recoup the costs,..




www.instagram.com
Throwing good money after bad won't recoup anything. Sunk cost fallacy at its finest.Feels like they've sunk too much into R&D and need to recoup the costs



NEW YORK, March 12 (Reuters) - Sesame Workshop, known for the iconic children's TV show "Sesame Street," sued SeaWorld on Thursday to end their decades-long relationship, accusing the theme park operator of withholding royalties and undermining the "Sesame Street" brand.
In a complaint filed in Manhattan federal court, Sesame Workshop said SeaWorld, a unit of United Parks & Resorts (PRKS.N), has been its exclusive U.S. theme park licensee for 45 years, opening several "Sesame Street"-themed parks and attractions featuring characters including Big Bird, Cookie Monster and Elmo.
Sesame Workshop, however, said SeaWorld has for a few years ignored the most recent licensing agreement, which dates from 2017, including by withholding royalties and closing sites, including the temporary closure of Sesame Place San Diego.
According to the complaint, matters worsened in September when SeaWorld stopped paying royalties to Sesame Workshop altogether, and as a pretext to end the relationship made the "preposterous" accusation that the New York-based nonprofit failed to invest in its own brand.
"SeaWorld’s rogue, retaliatory actions pose an imminent threat" to Sesame Workshop by tarnishing its reputation, using its intellectual property without permission and "disappointing children and families" who hoped to visit the closed sites, the complaint said.
“United Parks & Resorts has repeatedly failed to honor its contractual obligations, leaving Sesame Workshop no choice but to pursue litigation to protect our brand and the trust that families place in it," a Sesame Workshop spokesperson said in an emailed statement.
United Parks and SeaWorld, both based in Orlando, Florida, did not immediately respond to requests for comment after market hours.
The lawsuit also seeks unspecified compensatory and punitive damages.
In September 2024, a federal judge in Orlando upheld an arbitration ruling that required SeaWorld to pay Sesame Workshop more than $11 million, including interest for breaching their licensing agreement. SeaWorld didn't pay until October 2025, Sesame Workshop said.