Now it's 3!And to think, we get to marvel at the triangle live, in-person in only four days!
My 2cents. Main tophat up 1 section. 2nd Top hat hill, > 320 ft. Think outside the box.
.View attachment 24597
Sadly, with the way the triangular footers are aligned with the rest of the track, I don't think your 2nd Top hat wouldn't be supported enough.My 2cents. Main tophat up 1 section. 2nd Top hat hill, > 320 ft. Think outside the box.
.View attachment 24597
Unfortunately, I think It will just be a spike.Sadly, with the way the triangular footers are aligned with the rest of the track, I don't think your 2nd Top hat wouldn't be supported enough.
Yeah, think so too. :/Unfortunately, I think It will just be a spike.
This would be incredible, but there's just no way this is happening. If I had to guess it would be a spike and nothing more.My 2cents. Main tophat up 1 section. 2nd Top hat hill, > 320 ft. Think outside the box.
.View attachment 24597
Interesting, why would they be backward to expected force direction, with a spike? Check the centerline alignment.Sadly, with the way the triangular footers are aligned with the rest of the track, I don't think your 2nd Top hat wouldn't be supported enough.
I mean if they went with Zierer, the answer is simple:Interesting, why would they be backward to expected force direction, with a spike? Check the centerline alignment.
I just have a difficult time with the time to cycle (riders per hour) that a spike would add. Just can't see that. Also the footerspacing is less than current tophat by about 10 ft. I just can't see a swing launch working here.
I think you should look at the reasons for the down time. True at the start it was the hydraulic launch system. That got sorted out. The down mostly came from sensors on the brake section(s) flags of the track. A switch track swing spike launch will not fix that issue.Whenever talking about TTD's capacity with a spike, they don't often mention how the original ride was broken down almost half the time. Even if the train cycle time is decreased with this updated version, the launch should be much more reliable, decreasing downtime, and increasing capacity as a matter of course.
To add some context to that footer plan you've got here, since the box near the station is very new;So here is the best positioning and size that I have been able to come up with from various videos.
View attachment 24680
So
To push back a bit, Dragster didn't really have a sizeable capacity, even when operating at peak efficiency.I enjoy all the speculation mockups and hope for the best. They all miss something helpful which is capacity, spending lots of time on one section tricky to block off. The original set up could churn trains through and still have a whopper of a queue.
“That big, tall rollercoaster that we closed a few years ago — we are currently reimagining that ride, turning it into something different that our guests will love and enjoy,” Clark said. “We’re already working on the next roller coaster at the roller coaster capital.”
Clark said more details about the new coaster could start trickling out this summer.
“As a coaster enthusiast — but not a totally crazy coaster enthusiast — I am looking forward to it. I think it’s going to be an attraction that our guests will really love,” Clark said. “It’s going to provide that thrill, and in Cedar Point fashion — doing something that nobody else has done.”
He makes it sound like a new credit. Will you guys count it as a new credit?What Tony Clark has to say about this;
What will replace Cedar Point’s Top Thrill Dragster?
A spokesperson said new details are forthcoming on the park’s 18th roller coaster, coming in 2024.fox8.com