spicy said:
At least the 3DS offers the unique 3D aspect.
I think the 3DS offers more unique games. Though they're usually just a rehash of prior Nintendo games... There are still some decent enough games.
Colossus The Power of 10 said:
I`m not really fond of these handheld mobile gaming devices, I cant understand why they're successful, especially with regards to the DS.
The DS is popular because it sells mostly to kids. It's got playground popularity and on top of that tends to sell to slightly younger adults too who don't drive but spend a lot of time travelling. It's cheap enough to work as both a gift for kids whose parents don't want them to take up the TV with a big console, and it's a cheap way of getting games for the younger adults. The games on them (especially on the DS) tend to be suited to precisely the handheld they're on, yet deep enough to encourage long play sessions.
Colossus The Power of 10 said:
For gaming on the move I like crap like Angry Birds and Coin Dozer, that cost naff all, and that isn't to serious.
While this is a good point, your entry level device for this kind of gaming (unless you have a smart phone) is over £200. Okay, the Vita is higher than this and the 3DS was, but generally you can get a handheld dedicated gaming device and a couple of games for that price.
Colossus The Power of 10 said:
But this is all just opinion, it really depends on what gamer you are, I should imagine the PSP2 (yeah I called it a PSP2!) will be very successful.
I don't think it will be. It's expensive and appeals only to the kind of people who own a PS3. Most of those people won't buy into a handheld anyway because they already have the PS3. It's almost competing with itself. Unlike the 3DS which appeals to the 160 million+ and 100 million+ DS and Wii owners. It can happily compete with other Nintendo products which will naturally churn into 3DS sales.
I'm in a rather unique position. I own the house so the living room is "my domain". It has the PS3, but I do have to share it. So I find it's good to have a handheld so I can either sit on the sofa and play, or go upstairs to my bedroom. I think for most people here, they probably have their console/PC in their room with access to it at all times? So "in-house" portable gaming suits me, but I suspect worldwide I'm in a minority.
I can understand why people who want a Vita want a Vita, but I can't see an appeal that will make it a successful device. It's too big for commuter gamers. Too expensive for smart phone gamers (who tend to game cheap/free on an expensive device as it is) and doesn't have the game catalogue or software backing of a Nintendo device. It's just lacking the killer blow needed to make it really stand out. Nintendo half got it right with the 3DS with the built in stuff, but the Vita is trying to poke into smart-phone areas rather than concentrating on the gaming sector. I don't know what the solution is, but "game aware" is good, "social aware" not so good.