Nemesis Inferno said:
In regards to sales it was UK based lifetime sales...
http://www.nintendolife.com/news/2013/1 ... _in_the_uk
Ahhhh, fair enough
Still waiting on MS, but Sony have hit 2.1 million sales since release. That's essentially their release figures. It's substantially higher than the XB1 1 million - but we're missing a week's worth of data and Sony have now released in more territories so sales are bound to be higher.
Benin said:
Nintendo have enough cash reserve not to go into the SEGA route though, so even if the Wii U fails utterly, then they won't have to resort to making crap versions of once great games
Hopefully. The problem is that if sales don't pick up substantially, then at some point it doesn't even become financially viable for Nintendo to produce games for the system. I don't know what the profit point is in terms of sales, but if it's in millions, then they really could be in trouble.
That's what happened with Sega. The Saturn didn't sell well enough for any of their first party games to be profitable. Essentially they had to write off the entire console investment and kill it. Then everything went into the Dreamcast with the company essentially running at a loss (as Nintendo may do for the console - held up only by the handheld sales division). If the new console can't cover development cost and sales - then that entire side goes. Nintendo may well end up being just a handheld manufacturer if they're not careful. Obviously, we don't know the future, but the Wii U and first party games have to at some point operate profitably, or else the only real business decision is to stop it entirely. Then they need to decide if they enter the console wars again or not with a badly named Wii U 2.
Or they may pull it out of the bag with a Wii Y. No pad, cheap as chips, apps for your tablet and they back in the game. We may laugh at the 2DS, but it's a brilliant move.
Benin said:
I doubt the PS4/XBone will die off purely because of the 3rd party support, the CODs and Fifas are (for the majority) the games that get you the top money, the Wii U lacks both of the latest versions and are unlikely to see them again...
No, they won't and they already have enough sales and a high enough attachment rate to ensure the big developers continue supporting the systems. It's interesting though that the PS4 has beaten the previous console release record numbers. The previous winner? The PSP! We all know how that went for Sony...
Benin said:
A big issue for the Wii U was the lack of a killer launch game (although even Sony/Microsoft appear to have this issue) and then the lack of anything for the first half of the year... If they'd had a Zelda (Twilight Princess) or Wii Sports equivalent (Nintendoland was not this) then things could have easily struck gold again for them... Perhaps the arrogance angle is the correct view of the situation of it all, hence why Sony seem to have gone all out for PS4, whilst Microsoft seem obsessed with Kinect...
I still have no urge to get either mind...
I think part of the issue is that Nintendo never understood why the Wii sold. It sold because Wii Sports was:
a) Free
b) Accessible to pretty much everyone
c) Simple fun
d) A fad
That's what gave it the foothold. It was a happy accident that managed to catch the public's imagination at exactly the right time. It's something you simply can't repeat. Even with NSMB (which sold bucket loads on both the DS and Wii), the Wii U didn't sell. A Zelda also wouldn't have helped. The sales numbers - I think - really do reflect the number of hardcore Nintendo fans who could actually afford the console. If there had been Zelda, Mario Kart and SSMB on release, the console was still priced too high to encourage the on-the-fence Nintendo fans. Nintendo just assumed - arrogantly - that people bought the Wii because they loved Nintendo and what the Wii brought to the table holistically. In reality, they just wanted Wii Sports.
I think we'll see an upsurge in Wii U sales now the price has dropped and there are the games coming. It needs both games AND the right price. People need to understand value.
It's difficult to compare, but...
For £350, I got a PS4. It's something like 4 times "more powerful" than the Wii U. It can do all the extra stuff the Wii U can do (with a tablet and/or Vita - yes it costs more, but it's a consumer choice). It has a proper online social system that works easily and well. It has third party titles that are games released on all formats at pretty much the same time (not six month old titles ported) and a promise of continued heavy first and third party support. It's pushed as "the console for gamers".
You can make a similar argument for the XB1 too. There's perceived value to the gamer.
The Wii U came out showing no real power over the competition (PS3 and 360). No Wii Sports or original Nintendo software worth buying. Two versions, one of which was useless (the 8Gb version is, let's face it), the other which would set you back over £300. Old third party games you've already played and look almost as good on PS3/360 and no support from first or third party for either 12 months or just never.
Where was the value in the Wii U? It's like my 360, only with a tablet and twice the price and no games? I could stick with my 360, and buy a tablet. Or if I didn't have a 360, buy one and a tablet and it would still be cheaper and I'd have more games on each released every week than the Wii U does in a year.
No, you couldn't have Mario or Zelda, but you couldn't on the Wii U anyway.
So yeah, I think things will pick up now. £200 price point for the Wii U is worth it (not official, but lots of places are doing it for that off and on). The games are coming (though I still think they're over priced). They just need to work now on the online side, converging accounts and... A decent bloody Pokemon game on the system - preferably one that transfers to the 3DS. That would sell the system like hotcakes.